Commit 1a554ecc authored by Qi Zheng's avatar Qi Zheng Committed by Andrew Morton

Revert "mm: shrinkers: make count and scan in shrinker debugfs lockless"

This reverts commit 20cd1892.

Kernel test robot reports -88.8% regression in stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec
test case [1], which is caused by commit f95bdb70 ("mm: vmscan: make
global slab shrink lockless").  The root cause is that SRCU has to be
careful to not frequently check for SRCU read-side critical section exits.
Therefore, even if no one is currently in the SRCU read-side critical
section, synchronize_srcu() cannot return quickly.  That's why
unregister_shrinker() has become slower.

We will try to use the refcount+RCU method [2] proposed by Dave Chinner to
continue to re-implement the lockless slab shrink.  So revert the
shrinker_srcu related changes first.

[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202305230837.db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.com/
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZIJhou1d55d4H1s0@dread.disaster.area/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230609081518.3039120-5-qi.zheng@linux.devReported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202305230837.db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarQi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent c534f7cc
......@@ -5,12 +5,10 @@
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/shrinker.h>
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
/* defined in vmscan.c */
extern struct rw_semaphore shrinker_rwsem;
extern struct list_head shrinker_list;
extern struct srcu_struct shrinker_srcu;
static DEFINE_IDA(shrinker_debugfs_ida);
static struct dentry *shrinker_debugfs_root;
......@@ -51,13 +49,18 @@ static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
unsigned long total;
bool memcg_aware;
int ret = 0, nid, srcu_idx;
int ret, nid;
count_per_node = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!count_per_node)
return -ENOMEM;
srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&shrinker_srcu);
ret = down_read_killable(&shrinker_rwsem);
if (ret) {
kfree(count_per_node);
return ret;
}
rcu_read_lock();
memcg_aware = shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;
......@@ -88,7 +91,8 @@ static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
}
} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
srcu_read_unlock(&shrinker_srcu, srcu_idx);
rcu_read_unlock();
up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
kfree(count_per_node);
return ret;
......@@ -111,8 +115,9 @@ static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file,
.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
};
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
int nid, srcu_idx;
int nid;
char kbuf[72];
ssize_t ret;
read_len = size < (sizeof(kbuf) - 1) ? size : (sizeof(kbuf) - 1);
if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, read_len))
......@@ -141,7 +146,11 @@ static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file,
return -EINVAL;
}
srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&shrinker_srcu);
ret = down_read_killable(&shrinker_rwsem);
if (ret) {
mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
return ret;
}
sc.nid = nid;
sc.memcg = memcg;
......@@ -150,7 +159,7 @@ static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file,
shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, &sc);
srcu_read_unlock(&shrinker_srcu, srcu_idx);
up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
return size;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment