Commit 1a5ad30b authored by Rasmus Villemoes's avatar Rasmus Villemoes Committed by Vlastimil Babka

mm: slub: make slab_sysfs_init() a late_initcall

Currently, slab_sysfs_init() is an __initcall aka device_initcall. It
is rather time-consuming; on my board it takes around 11ms. That's
about 1% of the time budget I have from U-Boot letting go and until
linux must assume responsibility of keeping the external watchdog
happy.

There's no particular reason this would need to run at device_initcall
time, so instead make it a late_initcall to allow vital functionality
to get started a bit sooner.

This actually ends up winning more than just those 11ms, because the
slab caches that get created during other device_initcalls (and before
my watchdog device gets probed) now don't end up doing the somewhat
expensive sysfs_slab_add() themselves. Some example lines (with
initcall_debug set) before/after:

initcall ext4_init_fs+0x0/0x1ac returned 0 after 1386 usecs
initcall journal_init+0x0/0x138 returned 0 after 517 usecs
initcall init_fat_fs+0x0/0x68 returned 0 after 294 usecs

initcall ext4_init_fs+0x0/0x1ac returned 0 after 240 usecs
initcall journal_init+0x0/0x138 returned 0 after 32 usecs
initcall init_fat_fs+0x0/0x68 returned 0 after 18 usecs

Altogether, this means I now get to petting the watchdog around 17ms
sooner. [Of course, the time the other initcalls save is instead spent
in slab_sysfs_init(), which goes from 11ms to 16ms, so there's no
overall change in boot time.]
Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Acked-by: default avatarHyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
parent 979857ea
......@@ -6049,8 +6049,7 @@ static int __init slab_sysfs_init(void)
mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
return 0;
}
__initcall(slab_sysfs_init);
late_initcall(slab_sysfs_init);
#endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
#if defined(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment