Commit 1a92a80a authored by Benjamin Herrenschmidt's avatar Benjamin Herrenschmidt Committed by Michael Ellerman

powerpc/mm: Ensure cpumask update is ordered

There is no guarantee that the various isync's involved with
the context switch will order the update of the CPU mask with
the first TLB entry for the new context being loaded by the HW.

Be safe here and add a memory barrier to order any subsequent
load/store which may bring entries into the TLB.

The corresponding barrier on the other side already exists as
pte updates use pte_xchg() which uses __cmpxchg_u64 which has
a sync after the atomic operation.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
[mpe: Add comments in the code]
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
parent 5a69aec9
......@@ -90,6 +90,24 @@ static inline void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev,
/* Mark this context has been used on the new CPU */
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(next))) {
cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(next));
/*
* This full barrier orders the store to the cpumask above vs
* a subsequent operation which allows this CPU to begin loading
* translations for next.
*
* When using the radix MMU that operation is the load of the
* MMU context id, which is then moved to SPRN_PID.
*
* For the hash MMU it is either the first load from slb_cache
* in switch_slb(), and/or the store of paca->mm_ctx_id in
* copy_mm_to_paca().
*
* On the read side the barrier is in pte_xchg(), which orders
* the store to the PTE vs the load of mm_cpumask.
*/
smp_mb();
new_on_cpu = true;
}
......
......@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ static inline bool pte_xchg(pte_t *ptep, pte_t old, pte_t new)
unsigned long *p = (unsigned long *)ptep;
__be64 prev;
/* See comment in switch_mm_irqs_off() */
prev = (__force __be64)__cmpxchg_u64(p, (__force unsigned long)pte_raw(old),
(__force unsigned long)pte_raw(new));
......
......@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static inline bool pte_xchg(pte_t *ptep, pte_t old, pte_t new)
{
unsigned long *p = (unsigned long *)ptep;
/* See comment in switch_mm_irqs_off() */
return pte_val(old) == __cmpxchg_u64(p, pte_val(old), pte_val(new));
}
#endif
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment