Commit 1ad87824 authored by Dmitry Safonov's avatar Dmitry Safonov Committed by Linus Torvalds

um: add show_stack_loglvl()

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization.  It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side.  In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.  And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers.  Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.

Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by: default avatarDmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-37-dima@arista.comSigned-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 3dd923f3
......@@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
static void _print_addr(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
pr_info(" [<%08lx>] %s%pS\n", address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
const char *loglvl = data;
printk("%s [<%08lx>] %s%pS\n", loglvl, address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
(void *)address);
}
......@@ -25,7 +27,8 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops stackops = {
.address = _print_addr
};
void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack,
const char *loglvl)
{
struct pt_regs *segv_regs = current->thread.segv_regs;
int i;
......@@ -39,17 +42,22 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
if (!stack)
stack = get_stack_pointer(task, segv_regs);
pr_info("Stack:\n");
printk("%sStack:\n", loglvl);
for (i = 0; i < 3 * STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE; i++) {
if (kstack_end(stack))
break;
if (i && ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0))
pr_cont("\n");
printk("%s\n", loglvl);
pr_cont(" %08lx", *stack++);
}
pr_cont("\n");
printk("%s\n", loglvl);
printk("%sCall Trace:\n", loglvl);
dump_trace(current, &stackops, (void *)loglvl);
printk("%s\n", loglvl);
}
pr_info("Call Trace:\n");
dump_trace(current, &stackops, NULL);
pr_info("\n");
void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
{
show_stack_loglvl(task, stack, KERN_INFO);
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment