Commit 1b2797dc authored by Huang Ying's avatar Huang Ying Committed by H. Peter Anvin

x86, mce: improve mce_get_rip

Assume IP on the stack is valid when either EIPV or RIPV are set.
This influences whether the machine check exception handler decides
to return or panic.

This fixes a test case in the mce-test suite and is more compliant
to the specification.

This currently only makes a difference in a artificial testing
scenario with the mce-test test suite.

Also in addition do not force the EIPV to be valid with the exact
register MSRs, and keep in trust the CS value on stack even if MSR
is available.

[AK: combination of patches from Huang Ying and Hidetoshi Seto, with
new description by me]
[add some description, no code changed - HS]
Signed-off-by: default avatarHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
parent ac960375
...@@ -306,21 +306,22 @@ int mce_available(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) ...@@ -306,21 +306,22 @@ int mce_available(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
return cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MCE) && cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MCA); return cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MCE) && cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MCA);
} }
/*
* Get the address of the instruction at the time of the machine check
* error.
*/
static inline void mce_get_rip(struct mce *m, struct pt_regs *regs) static inline void mce_get_rip(struct mce *m, struct pt_regs *regs)
{ {
if (regs && (m->mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV)) {
if (regs && (m->mcgstatus & (MCG_STATUS_RIPV|MCG_STATUS_EIPV))) {
m->ip = regs->ip; m->ip = regs->ip;
m->cs = regs->cs; m->cs = regs->cs;
} else { } else {
m->ip = 0; m->ip = 0;
m->cs = 0; m->cs = 0;
} }
if (rip_msr) { if (rip_msr)
/* Assume the RIP in the MSR is exact. Is this true? */
m->mcgstatus |= MCG_STATUS_EIPV;
m->ip = mce_rdmsrl(rip_msr); m->ip = mce_rdmsrl(rip_msr);
m->cs = 0;
}
} }
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment