Commit 1b61c4a3 authored by Jani Nikula's avatar Jani Nikula

drm/i915/dp: deconflate PPS unlock from divisor register

PPS locking is a thing on pre-DDI, up to and including CPT and PPT.

The PPS divisor register exists up to gen 9 BC, replaced by a field in
the control register starting from gen 9 LP, i.e. BXT, GLK, and CNP on.

Commit b0a08bec ("drm/i915/bxt: eDP Panel Power sequencing") stopped
using the divisor register, but inadvertently conflated the PPS unlock
in the change. No longer doing the unlocking was the right thing to do,
however we should've stopped already at LPT (or DDI platforms).

Deconflate the two.

Arguably this could be moved away from here altogether, but this is the
minimally intrusive change for now.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190305135215.29862-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
parent 7d6ce558
......@@ -6425,15 +6425,16 @@ intel_pps_readout_hw_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct edp_power_seq *seq)
intel_pps_get_registers(intel_dp, &regs);
/* Workaround: Need to write PP_CONTROL with the unlock key as
* the very first thing. */
pp_ctl = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);
/* Ensure PPS is unlocked */
if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
I915_WRITE(regs.pp_ctrl, pp_ctl);
pp_on = I915_READ(regs.pp_on);
pp_off = I915_READ(regs.pp_off);
if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && !HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv) &&
!HAS_PCH_ICP(dev_priv)) {
I915_WRITE(regs.pp_ctrl, pp_ctl);
pp_div = I915_READ(regs.pp_div);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment