Commit 1c4344a5 authored by Ian Kent's avatar Ian Kent Committed by Al Viro

autofs - dont hold spin lock over direct mount expire

Commit 7cbdb4a2 altered the autofs indirect mount expire to
not hold a spin lock during the expire check.

The direct mount expire needs the same treatment because to
make autofs expires namespace aware may_umount_tree() needs to
to use a similar method to may_umount() when checking if a mount
tree is in use.

This means may_umount_tree() will end up taking the namespace_sem
for the check so the autofs direct mount expire won't be allowed
to hold a spin lock over the check.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIan Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
parent 455e8f10
......@@ -310,26 +310,29 @@ struct dentry *autofs4_expire_direct(struct super_block *sb,
now = jiffies;
timeout = sbi->exp_timeout;
spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
ino = autofs4_dentry_ino(root);
/* No point expiring a pending mount */
if (ino->flags & AUTOFS_INF_PENDING)
goto out;
if (!autofs4_direct_busy(mnt, root, timeout, do_now)) {
spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
ino = autofs4_dentry_ino(root);
/* No point expiring a pending mount */
if (ino->flags & AUTOFS_INF_PENDING) {
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
goto out;
}
ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_WANT_EXPIRE;
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
synchronize_rcu();
spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
if (!autofs4_direct_busy(mnt, root, timeout, do_now)) {
spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
ino->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING;
init_completion(&ino->expire_complete);
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
return root;
}
spin_lock(&sbi->fs_lock);
ino->flags &= ~AUTOFS_INF_WANT_EXPIRE;
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
}
out:
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
dput(root);
return NULL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment