Commit 1d70ba3b authored by Amelie Delaunay's avatar Amelie Delaunay Committed by Alexandre Belloni

rtc: stm32: fix comparison warnings

This patches fixes comparison between signed and unsigned values as it
could produce an incorrect result when the signed value is converted to
unsigned:

drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c: In function 'stm32_rtc_valid_alrm':
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:404:21: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
  if ((((tm->tm_year > cur_year) &&
...

It also fixes comparison always true or false due to the fact that unsigned
value is compared against zero with >= or <:

drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c: In function 'stm32_rtc_init':
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:514:35: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Wtype-limits]
  for (pred_a = pred_a_max; pred_a >= 0; pred_a-- ) {

drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:530:44: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
     (rate - ((pred_a + 1) * (pred_s + 1)) < 0) ?

Fixes: 4e64350f ("rtc: add STM32 RTC driver")
Signed-off-by: default avatarAmelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
parent a560c527
...@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled) ...@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
static int stm32_rtc_valid_alrm(struct stm32_rtc *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm) static int stm32_rtc_valid_alrm(struct stm32_rtc *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm)
{ {
unsigned int cur_day, cur_mon, cur_year, cur_hour, cur_min, cur_sec; int cur_day, cur_mon, cur_year, cur_hour, cur_min, cur_sec;
unsigned int dr = readl_relaxed(rtc->base + STM32_RTC_DR); unsigned int dr = readl_relaxed(rtc->base + STM32_RTC_DR);
unsigned int tr = readl_relaxed(rtc->base + STM32_RTC_TR); unsigned int tr = readl_relaxed(rtc->base + STM32_RTC_TR);
...@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_init(struct platform_device *pdev, ...@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
pred_a_max = STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_A >> STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_A_SHIFT; pred_a_max = STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_A >> STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_A_SHIFT;
pred_s_max = STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_S >> STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_S_SHIFT; pred_s_max = STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_S >> STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_S_SHIFT;
for (pred_a = pred_a_max; pred_a >= 0; pred_a--) { for (pred_a = pred_a_max; pred_a + 1 > 0; pred_a--) {
pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1; pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
if (((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate) if (((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate)
...@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_init(struct platform_device *pdev, ...@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1; pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "ck_rtc is %s\n", dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "ck_rtc is %s\n",
(rate - ((pred_a + 1) * (pred_s + 1)) < 0) ? (rate < ((pred_a + 1) * (pred_s + 1))) ?
"fast" : "slow"); "fast" : "slow");
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment