Commit 1f37bf87 authored by Marcelo Leitner's avatar Marcelo Leitner Committed by David S. Miller

tcp: zero retrans_stamp if all retrans were acked

Ueki Kohei reported that when we are using NewReno with connections that
have a very low traffic, we may timeout the connection too early if a
second loss occurs after the first one was successfully acked but no
data was transfered later. Below is his description of it:

When SACK is disabled, and a socket suffers multiple separate TCP
retransmissions, that socket's ETIMEDOUT value is calculated from the
time of the *first* retransmission instead of the *latest*
retransmission.

This happens because the tcp_sock's retrans_stamp is set once then never
cleared.

Take the following connection:

                      Linux                    remote-machine
                        |                           |
         send#1---->(*1)|--------> data#1 --------->|
                  |     |                           |
                 RTO    :                           :
                  |     |                           |
                 ---(*2)|----> data#1(retrans) ---->|
                  | (*3)|<---------- ACK <----------|
                  |     |                           |
                  |     :                           :
                  |     :                           :
                  |     :                           :
                16 minutes (or more)                :
                  |     :                           :
                  |     :                           :
                  |     :                           :
                  |     |                           |
         send#2---->(*4)|--------> data#2 --------->|
                  |     |                           |
                 RTO    :                           :
                  |     |                           |
                 ---(*5)|----> data#2(retrans) ---->|
                  |     |                           |
                  |     |                           |
                RTO*2   :                           :
                  |     |                           |
                  |     |                           |
      ETIMEDOUT<----(*6)|                           |

(*1) One data packet sent.
(*2) Because no ACK packet is received, the packet is retransmitted.
(*3) The ACK packet is received. The transmitted packet is acknowledged.

At this point the first "retransmission event" has passed and been
recovered from. Any future retransmission is a completely new "event".

(*4) After 16 minutes (to correspond with retries2=15), a new data
packet is sent. Note: No data is transmitted between (*3) and (*4).

The socket's timeout SHOULD be calculated from this point in time, but
instead it's calculated from the prior "event" 16 minutes ago.

(*5) Because no ACK packet is received, the packet is retransmitted.
(*6) At the time of the 2nd retransmission, the socket returns
ETIMEDOUT.

Therefore, now we clear retrans_stamp as soon as all data during the
loss window is fully acked.

Reported-by: Ueki Kohei
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Tested-by: default avatarNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 46d38026
......@@ -2315,6 +2315,35 @@ static inline bool tcp_packet_delayed(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
/* Undo procedures. */
/* We can clear retrans_stamp when there are no retransmissions in the
* window. It would seem that it is trivially available for us in
* tp->retrans_out, however, that kind of assumptions doesn't consider
* what will happen if errors occur when sending retransmission for the
* second time. ...It could the that such segment has only
* TCPCB_EVER_RETRANS set at the present time. It seems that checking
* the head skb is enough except for some reneging corner cases that
* are not worth the effort.
*
* Main reason for all this complexity is the fact that connection dying
* time now depends on the validity of the retrans_stamp, in particular,
* that successive retransmissions of a segment must not advance
* retrans_stamp under any conditions.
*/
static bool tcp_any_retrans_done(const struct sock *sk)
{
const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
struct sk_buff *skb;
if (tp->retrans_out)
return true;
skb = tcp_write_queue_head(sk);
if (unlikely(skb && TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_EVER_RETRANS))
return true;
return false;
}
#if FASTRETRANS_DEBUG > 1
static void DBGUNDO(struct sock *sk, const char *msg)
{
......@@ -2410,6 +2439,8 @@ static bool tcp_try_undo_recovery(struct sock *sk)
* is ACKed. For Reno it is MUST to prevent false
* fast retransmits (RFC2582). SACK TCP is safe. */
tcp_moderate_cwnd(tp);
if (!tcp_any_retrans_done(sk))
tp->retrans_stamp = 0;
return true;
}
tcp_set_ca_state(sk, TCP_CA_Open);
......@@ -2430,35 +2461,6 @@ static bool tcp_try_undo_dsack(struct sock *sk)
return false;
}
/* We can clear retrans_stamp when there are no retransmissions in the
* window. It would seem that it is trivially available for us in
* tp->retrans_out, however, that kind of assumptions doesn't consider
* what will happen if errors occur when sending retransmission for the
* second time. ...It could the that such segment has only
* TCPCB_EVER_RETRANS set at the present time. It seems that checking
* the head skb is enough except for some reneging corner cases that
* are not worth the effort.
*
* Main reason for all this complexity is the fact that connection dying
* time now depends on the validity of the retrans_stamp, in particular,
* that successive retransmissions of a segment must not advance
* retrans_stamp under any conditions.
*/
static bool tcp_any_retrans_done(const struct sock *sk)
{
const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
struct sk_buff *skb;
if (tp->retrans_out)
return true;
skb = tcp_write_queue_head(sk);
if (unlikely(skb && TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_EVER_RETRANS))
return true;
return false;
}
/* Undo during loss recovery after partial ACK or using F-RTO. */
static bool tcp_try_undo_loss(struct sock *sk, bool frto_undo)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment