Commit 1f686f2b authored by Jakub Kicinski's avatar Jakub Kicinski

Merge branch 'wireguard-patches-for-5-18-rc1'

Jason A. Donenfeld says:

====================
wireguard patches for 5.18-rc1

Here's a small set of fixes for the next net push:

1) Pipacs reported a CFI violation in a cleanup routine, which he
   triggered using grsec's RAP. I haven't seen reports of this yet from
   the Android/CFI world yet, but it's only a matter of time there.

2) A small rng cleanup to the self test harness to make it initialize
   faster on 5.18.

3) Wang reported and fixed a skb leak for CONFIG_IPV6=n.

4) After Wang's fix for the direct leak, I investigated how that code
   path even could be hit, and found that the netlink layer still
   handles IPv6 endpoints, when it probably shouldn't.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220330013127.426620-1-Jason@zx2c4.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parents c9ad266b 77fc73ac
......@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
*/
#include "queueing.h"
#include <linux/skb_array.h>
struct multicore_worker __percpu *
wg_packet_percpu_multicore_worker_alloc(work_func_t function, void *ptr)
......@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@ void wg_packet_queue_free(struct crypt_queue *queue, bool purge)
{
free_percpu(queue->worker);
WARN_ON(!purge && !__ptr_ring_empty(&queue->ring));
ptr_ring_cleanup(&queue->ring, purge ? (void(*)(void*))kfree_skb : NULL);
ptr_ring_cleanup(&queue->ring, purge ? __skb_array_destroy_skb : NULL);
}
#define NEXT(skb) ((skb)->prev)
......
......@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static int send6(struct wg_device *wg, struct sk_buff *skb,
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
return ret;
#else
kfree_skb(skb);
return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
#endif
}
......@@ -241,7 +242,7 @@ int wg_socket_endpoint_from_skb(struct endpoint *endpoint,
endpoint->addr4.sin_addr.s_addr = ip_hdr(skb)->saddr;
endpoint->src4.s_addr = ip_hdr(skb)->daddr;
endpoint->src_if4 = skb->skb_iif;
} else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
endpoint->addr6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
endpoint->addr6.sin6_port = udp_hdr(skb)->source;
endpoint->addr6.sin6_addr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr;
......@@ -284,7 +285,7 @@ void wg_socket_set_peer_endpoint(struct wg_peer *peer,
peer->endpoint.addr4 = endpoint->addr4;
peer->endpoint.src4 = endpoint->src4;
peer->endpoint.src_if4 = endpoint->src_if4;
} else if (endpoint->addr.sa_family == AF_INET6) {
} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && endpoint->addr.sa_family == AF_INET6) {
peer->endpoint.addr6 = endpoint->addr6;
peer->endpoint.src6 = endpoint->src6;
} else {
......
......@@ -56,26 +56,14 @@ static void print_banner(void)
static void seed_rng(void)
{
int fd;
struct {
int entropy_count;
int buffer_size;
unsigned char buffer[256];
} entropy = {
.entropy_count = sizeof(entropy.buffer) * 8,
.buffer_size = sizeof(entropy.buffer),
.buffer = "Adding real entropy is not actually important for these tests. Don't try this at home, kids!"
};
int bits = 256, fd;
if (mknod("/dev/urandom", S_IFCHR | 0644, makedev(1, 9)))
panic("mknod(/dev/urandom)");
fd = open("/dev/urandom", O_WRONLY);
pretty_message("[+] Fake seeding RNG...");
fd = open("/dev/random", O_WRONLY);
if (fd < 0)
panic("open(urandom)");
for (int i = 0; i < 256; ++i) {
if (ioctl(fd, RNDADDENTROPY, &entropy) < 0)
panic("ioctl(urandom)");
}
panic("open(random)");
if (ioctl(fd, RNDADDTOENTCNT, &bits) < 0)
panic("ioctl(RNDADDTOENTCNT)");
close(fd);
}
......@@ -270,10 +258,10 @@ static void check_leaks(void)
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
seed_rng();
ensure_console();
print_banner();
mount_filesystems();
seed_rng();
kmod_selftests();
enable_logging();
clear_leaks();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment