Commit 20686a30 authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Linus Torvalds

ptrace_stop: fix racy nonstop_code setting

If the tracer is gone and we are not going to stop, ptrace_stop() sets
->exit_code = nostop_code.  However, the tracer could actually clear the
exit code before detaching.  In that case get_signal_to_deliver() "resends"
the signal which was cancelled by the debugger.  For example, it is
possible that a quick PTRACE_ATTACH + PTRACE_DETACH can leave the tracee in
STOPPED state.

Change the behaviour of ptrace_stop().  If the caller is ptrace notify(),
we should always clear ->exit_code.  If the caller is
get_signal_to_deliver(), we should not touch it at all.  To do so, change
the nonstop_code parameter to "bool clear_code" and change the callers
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-by: default avatarRoland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 9cbab810
...@@ -1591,10 +1591,10 @@ static int sigkill_pending(struct task_struct *tsk) ...@@ -1591,10 +1591,10 @@ static int sigkill_pending(struct task_struct *tsk)
* That makes it a way to test a stopped process for * That makes it a way to test a stopped process for
* being ptrace-stopped vs being job-control-stopped. * being ptrace-stopped vs being job-control-stopped.
* *
* If we actually decide not to stop at all because the tracer is gone, * If we actually decide not to stop at all because the tracer
* we leave nostop_code in current->exit_code. * is gone, we keep current->exit_code unless clear_code.
*/ */
static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int nostop_code, siginfo_t *info) static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int clear_code, siginfo_t *info)
{ {
int killed = 0; int killed = 0;
...@@ -1641,7 +1641,8 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int nostop_code, siginfo_t *info) ...@@ -1641,7 +1641,8 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int nostop_code, siginfo_t *info)
* Don't drop the lock yet, another tracer may come. * Don't drop the lock yet, another tracer may come.
*/ */
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
current->exit_code = nostop_code; if (clear_code)
current->exit_code = 0;
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
} }
...@@ -1675,7 +1676,7 @@ void ptrace_notify(int exit_code) ...@@ -1675,7 +1676,7 @@ void ptrace_notify(int exit_code)
/* Let the debugger run. */ /* Let the debugger run. */
spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock); spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
ptrace_stop(exit_code, 0, &info); ptrace_stop(exit_code, 1, &info);
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock); spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
} }
...@@ -1782,7 +1783,7 @@ int get_signal_to_deliver(siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *return_ka, ...@@ -1782,7 +1783,7 @@ int get_signal_to_deliver(siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *return_ka,
ptrace_signal_deliver(regs, cookie); ptrace_signal_deliver(regs, cookie);
/* Let the debugger run. */ /* Let the debugger run. */
ptrace_stop(signr, signr, info); ptrace_stop(signr, 0, info);
/* We're back. Did the debugger cancel the sig? */ /* We're back. Did the debugger cancel the sig? */
signr = current->exit_code; signr = current->exit_code;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment