scsi: bnx2fc: Avoid using get_cpu() in bnx2fc_cmd_alloc()

Using get_cpu() leads to disabling preemption and in this context it is not
possible to acquire the following spinlock_t on PREEMPT_RT because it
becomes a sleeping lock.

Commit 0ea5c275 ("[SCSI] bnx2fc: common free list for cleanup
commands") says that it is using get_cpu() as a fix in case the CPU is
preempted.  While this might be true, the important part is that it is now
using the same CPU for locking and unlocking while previously it always
relied on smp_processor_id().  The date structure itself is protected with
a lock so it does not rely on CPU-local access.

Replace get_cpu() with raw_smp_processor_id() to obtain the current CPU
number which is used as an index for the per-CPU resource.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506105758.283887-5-bigeasy@linutronix.deReviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_io.c

@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ struct bnx2fc_cmd *bnx2fc_cmd_alloc(struct bnx2fc_rport *tgt)
 	u32 free_sqes;
 	u32 max_sqes;
 	u16 xid;
-	int index = get_cpu();
+	int index = raw_smp_processor_id();
 
 	max_sqes = BNX2FC_SCSI_MAX_SQES;
 	/*
@@ -485,7 +485,6 @@ struct bnx2fc_cmd *bnx2fc_cmd_alloc(struct bnx2fc_rport *tgt)
 	    (tgt->num_active_ios.counter  >= max_sqes) ||
 	    (free_sqes + max_sqes <= BNX2FC_SQ_WQES_MAX)) {
 		spin_unlock_bh(&cmd_mgr->free_list_lock[index]);
-		put_cpu();
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
@@ -498,7 +497,6 @@ struct bnx2fc_cmd *bnx2fc_cmd_alloc(struct bnx2fc_rport *tgt)
 	atomic_inc(&tgt->num_active_ios);
 	atomic_dec(&tgt->free_sqes);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&cmd_mgr->free_list_lock[index]);
-	put_cpu();
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&io_req->link);