Commit 2164d334 authored by Cong Wang's avatar Cong Wang

pipe: remove KM_USER0 from comments

Signed-off-by: default avatarCong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
parent a8e5202d
......@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void anon_pipe_buf_release(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
* and the caller has to be careful not to fault before calling
* the unmap function.
*
* Note that this function occupies KM_USER0 if @atomic != 0.
* Note that this function calls kmap_atomic() if @atomic != 0.
*/
void *generic_pipe_buf_map(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
struct pipe_buffer *buf, int atomic)
......
......@@ -86,11 +86,9 @@ struct pipe_buf_operations {
* mapping or not. The atomic map is faster, however you can't take
* page faults before calling ->unmap() again. So if you need to eg
* access user data through copy_to/from_user(), then you must get
* a non-atomic map. ->map() uses the KM_USER0 atomic slot for
* atomic maps, so you can't map more than one pipe_buffer at once
* and you have to be careful if mapping another page as source
* or destination for a copy (IOW, it has to use something else
* than KM_USER0).
* a non-atomic map. ->map() uses the kmap_atomic slot for
* atomic maps, you have to be careful if mapping another page as
* source or destination for a copy.
*/
void * (*map)(struct pipe_inode_info *, struct pipe_buffer *, int);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment