Commit 2311e327 authored by David Howells's avatar David Howells

rxrpc: Be consistent about switch value in rxrpc_send_call_packet()

rxrpc_send_call_packet() should use type in both its switch-statements
rather than using pkt->whdr.type.  This might give the compiler an easier
job of uninitialised variable checking.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
parent 27d0fc43
...@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int rxrpc_send_call_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, u8 type) ...@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int rxrpc_send_call_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, u8 type)
&msg, iov, ioc, len); &msg, iov, ioc, len);
if (ret < 0 && call->state < RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE) { if (ret < 0 && call->state < RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE) {
switch (pkt->whdr.type) { switch (type) {
case RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_ACK: case RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_ACK:
rxrpc_propose_ACK(call, pkt->ack.reason, rxrpc_propose_ACK(call, pkt->ack.reason,
ntohs(pkt->ack.maxSkew), ntohs(pkt->ack.maxSkew),
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment