selftests/bpf: prevent unused variable warning in bpf_for()

Add __attribute__((unused)) to inner __p variable inside bpf_for(),
bpf_for_each(), and bpf_repeat() macros to avoid compiler warnings about
unused variable.
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309054015.4068562-2-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h

@@ -115,7 +115,8 @@ extern void bpf_iter_num_destroy(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __ksym;
 	struct bpf_iter_##type ___it __attribute__((aligned(8), /* enforce, just in case */,	\
 						    cleanup(bpf_iter_##type##_destroy))),	\
 	/* ___p pointer is just to call bpf_iter_##type##_new() *once* to init ___it */		\
-			       *___p = (bpf_iter_##type##_new(&___it, ##args),			\
+			       *___p __attribute__((unused)) = (				\
+					bpf_iter_##type##_new(&___it, ##args),			\
 	/* this is a workaround for Clang bug: it currently doesn't emit BTF */			\
 	/* for bpf_iter_##type##_destroy() when used from cleanup() attribute */		\
 					(void)bpf_iter_##type##_destroy, (void *)0);		\
@@ -143,7 +144,8 @@ extern void bpf_iter_num_destroy(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __ksym;
 	struct bpf_iter_num ___it __attribute__((aligned(8), /* enforce, just in case */	\
 						 cleanup(bpf_iter_num_destroy))),		\
 	/* ___p pointer is necessary to call bpf_iter_num_new() *once* to init ___it */		\
-			    *___p = (bpf_iter_num_new(&___it, (start), (end)),			\
+			    *___p __attribute__((unused)) = (					\
+				bpf_iter_num_new(&___it, (start), (end)),			\
 	/* this is a workaround for Clang bug: it currently doesn't emit BTF */			\
 	/* for bpf_iter_num_destroy() when used from cleanup() attribute */			\
 				(void)bpf_iter_num_destroy, (void *)0);				\
@@ -167,7 +169,8 @@ extern void bpf_iter_num_destroy(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __ksym;
 	struct bpf_iter_num ___it __attribute__((aligned(8), /* enforce, just in case */	\
 						 cleanup(bpf_iter_num_destroy))),		\
 	/* ___p pointer is necessary to call bpf_iter_num_new() *once* to init ___it */		\
-			    *___p = (bpf_iter_num_new(&___it, 0, (N)),				\
+			    *___p __attribute__((unused)) = (					\
+				bpf_iter_num_new(&___it, 0, (N)),				\
 	/* this is a workaround for Clang bug: it currently doesn't emit BTF */			\
 	/* for bpf_iter_num_destroy() when used from cleanup() attribute */			\
 				(void)bpf_iter_num_destroy, (void *)0);				\