Commit 24e988f6 authored by Andy Lutomirski's avatar Andy Lutomirski Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation

commit 2a418cf3 upstream.

When calling __put_user(foo(), ptr), the __put_user() macro would call
foo() in between __uaccess_begin() and __uaccess_end().  If that code
were buggy, then those bugs would be run without SMAP protection.

Fortunately, there seem to be few instances of the problem in the
kernel. Nevertheless, __put_user() should be fixed to avoid doing this.
Therefore, evaluate __put_user()'s argument before setting AC.

This issue was noticed when an objtool hack by Peter Zijlstra complained
about genregs_get() and I compared the assembly output to the C source.

 [ bp: Massage commit message and fixed up whitespace. ]

Fixes: 11f1a4b9 ("x86: reorganize SMAP handling in user space accesses")
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190225125231.845656645@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent e01f0914
......@@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ do { \
__put_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, "l", "k", "ir", errret); \
break; \
case 8: \
__put_user_asm_u64((__typeof__(*ptr))(x), ptr, retval, \
errret); \
__put_user_asm_u64(x, ptr, retval, errret); \
break; \
default: \
__put_user_bad(); \
......@@ -440,8 +439,10 @@ do { \
#define __put_user_nocheck(x, ptr, size) \
({ \
int __pu_err; \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val; \
__pu_val = x; \
__uaccess_begin(); \
__put_user_size((x), (ptr), (size), __pu_err, -EFAULT); \
__put_user_size(__pu_val, (ptr), (size), __pu_err, -EFAULT);\
__uaccess_end(); \
__builtin_expect(__pu_err, 0); \
})
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment