Commit 250a1ac6 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

x86, smpboot: Remove pointless preempt_disable() in native_smp_prepare_cpus()

There is no reason to keep preemption disabled in this function.

We only have two other threads live: kthreadd and idle. Neither of
them is going to preempt. But that preempt_disable forces all the code
inside to do GFP_ATOMIC allocations which is just insane.

Remove it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141205084147.153643952@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent 5db66334
......@@ -1084,7 +1084,6 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
{
unsigned int i;
preempt_disable();
smp_cpu_index_default();
/*
......@@ -1102,22 +1101,19 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
}
set_cpu_sibling_map(0);
if (smp_sanity_check(max_cpus) < 0) {
pr_info("SMP disabled\n");
disable_smp();
goto out;
return;
}
default_setup_apic_routing();
preempt_disable();
if (read_apic_id() != boot_cpu_physical_apicid) {
panic("Boot APIC ID in local APIC unexpected (%d vs %d)",
read_apic_id(), boot_cpu_physical_apicid);
/* Or can we switch back to PIC here? */
}
preempt_enable();
connect_bsp_APIC();
......@@ -1151,8 +1147,6 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
uv_system_init();
set_mtrr_aps_delayed_init();
out:
preempt_enable();
}
void arch_enable_nonboot_cpus_begin(void)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment