drm/i915: Introduce parameterized DBUF_CTL
Now start using parameterized DBUF_CTL instead of hardcoded, this would allow shorter access functions when reading or storing entire state. Tried to implement it in a MMIO_PIPE manner, however DBUF_CTL1 address is higher than DBUF_CTL2, which implies that we have to now subtract from base rather than add. v2: - Removed unneeded DBUF_CTL_DIST and DBUF_CTL_ADDR macros. Started to use _PICK construct as suggested by Matt Roper. v3: - _DBUF_CTL_S* to DBUF_CTL_S*, changed X to "slice" in macro(Ville Syrjälä) - Introduced enum for enumerating DBUF slices(Ville Syrjälä) Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200202230630.8975-5-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment