Commit 2630cde2 authored by Michal Koutný's avatar Michal Koutný Committed by Peter Zijlstra

sched/fair: Add ancestors of unthrottled undecayed cfs_rq

Since commit a7b359fc ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to
list on unthrottle") we add cfs_rqs with no runnable tasks but not fully
decayed into the load (leaf) list. We may ignore adding some ancestors
and therefore breaking tmp_alone_branch invariant. This broke LTP test
cfs_bandwidth01 and it was partially fixed in commit fdaba61e
("sched/fair: Ensure that the CFS parent is added after unthrottling").

I noticed the named test still fails even with the fix (but with low
probability, 1 in ~1000 executions of the test). The reason is when
bailing out of unthrottle_cfs_rq early, we may miss adding ancestors of
the unthrottled cfs_rq, thus, not joining tmp_alone_branch properly.

Fix this by adding ancestors if we notice the unthrottled cfs_rq was
added to the load list.

Fixes: a7b359fc ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOdin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210917153037.11176-1-mkoutny@suse.com
parent e4e737bb
......@@ -4936,8 +4936,12 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
/* update hierarchical throttle state */
walk_tg_tree_from(cfs_rq->tg, tg_nop, tg_unthrottle_up, (void *)rq);
if (!cfs_rq->load.weight)
/* Nothing to run but something to decay (on_list)? Complete the branch */
if (!cfs_rq->load.weight) {
if (cfs_rq->on_list)
goto unthrottle_throttle;
return;
}
task_delta = cfs_rq->h_nr_running;
idle_task_delta = cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment