Commit 26d92e95 authored by Cong Wang's avatar Cong Wang Committed by David S. Miller

smc: move unhash as early as possible in smc_release()

In smc_release() we release smc->clcsock before unhash the smc
sock, but a parallel smc_diag_dump() may be still reading
smc->clcsock, therefore this could cause a use-after-free as
reported by syzbot.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+fbd1e5476e4c94c7b34e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 51f1de79 ("net/smc: replace sock_put worker by socket refcounting")
Cc: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+0bf2e01269f1274b4b03@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+e3132895630f957306bc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 7acf8b36
......@@ -146,6 +146,9 @@ static int smc_release(struct socket *sock)
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD);
sk->sk_shutdown |= SHUTDOWN_MASK;
}
sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
if (smc->clcsock) {
if (smc->use_fallback && sk->sk_state == SMC_LISTEN) {
/* wake up clcsock accept */
......@@ -170,7 +173,6 @@ static int smc_release(struct socket *sock)
smc_conn_free(&smc->conn);
release_sock(sk);
sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
sock_put(sk); /* final sock_put */
out:
return rc;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment