Commit 289b4e7a authored by Uwe Kleine-König's avatar Uwe Kleine-König Committed by Ingo Molnar

locking, dma, ipu: Annotate bank_lock as raw

The bank_lock can be taken in atomic context (irq handling)
and therefore cannot be preempted on -rt - annotate it.

In mainline this change documents the low level nature of
the lock - otherwise there's no functional difference. Lockdep
and Sparse checking will work as usual.
Signed-off-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1311949627-13260-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent bd31b859
......@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static struct ipu_irq_map irq_map[CONFIG_MX3_IPU_IRQS];
/* Protects allocations from the above array of maps */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(map_lock);
/* Protects register accesses and individual mappings */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bank_lock);
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(bank_lock);
static struct ipu_irq_map *src2map(unsigned int src)
{
......@@ -101,11 +101,11 @@ static void ipu_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
uint32_t reg;
unsigned long lock_flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
bank = map->bank;
if (!bank) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
pr_err("IPU: %s(%u) - unmapped!\n", __func__, d->irq);
return;
}
......@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void ipu_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
reg |= (1UL << (map->source & 31));
ipu_write_reg(bank->ipu, reg, bank->control);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
}
static void ipu_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
......@@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ static void ipu_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
uint32_t reg;
unsigned long lock_flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
bank = map->bank;
if (!bank) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
pr_err("IPU: %s(%u) - unmapped!\n", __func__, d->irq);
return;
}
......@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static void ipu_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
reg &= ~(1UL << (map->source & 31));
ipu_write_reg(bank->ipu, reg, bank->control);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
}
static void ipu_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
......@@ -146,17 +146,17 @@ static void ipu_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
struct ipu_irq_bank *bank;
unsigned long lock_flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
bank = map->bank;
if (!bank) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
pr_err("IPU: %s(%u) - unmapped!\n", __func__, d->irq);
return;
}
ipu_write_reg(bank->ipu, 1UL << (map->source & 31), bank->status);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
}
/**
......@@ -172,11 +172,11 @@ bool ipu_irq_status(unsigned int irq)
unsigned long lock_flags;
bool ret;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
bank = map->bank;
ret = bank && ipu_read_reg(bank->ipu, bank->status) &
(1UL << (map->source & 31));
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
return ret;
}
......@@ -213,10 +213,10 @@ int ipu_irq_map(unsigned int source)
if (irq_map[i].source < 0) {
unsigned long lock_flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
irq_map[i].source = source;
irq_map[i].bank = irq_bank + source / 32;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
ret = irq_map[i].irq;
pr_debug("IPU: mapped source %u to IRQ %u\n",
......@@ -252,10 +252,10 @@ int ipu_irq_unmap(unsigned int source)
pr_debug("IPU: unmapped source %u from IRQ %u\n",
source, irq_map[i].irq);
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
irq_map[i].source = -EINVAL;
irq_map[i].bank = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank_lock, lock_flags);
ret = 0;
break;
......@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static void ipu_irq_err(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
for (i = IPU_IRQ_NR_FN_BANKS; i < IPU_IRQ_NR_BANKS; i++) {
struct ipu_irq_bank *bank = irq_bank + i;
spin_lock(&bank_lock);
raw_spin_lock(&bank_lock);
status = ipu_read_reg(ipu, bank->status);
/*
* Don't think we have to clear all interrupts here, they will
......@@ -284,18 +284,18 @@ static void ipu_irq_err(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
* might want to clear unhandled interrupts after the loop...
*/
status &= ipu_read_reg(ipu, bank->control);
spin_unlock(&bank_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&bank_lock);
while ((line = ffs(status))) {
struct ipu_irq_map *map;
line--;
status &= ~(1UL << line);
spin_lock(&bank_lock);
raw_spin_lock(&bank_lock);
map = src2map(32 * i + line);
if (map)
irq = map->irq;
spin_unlock(&bank_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&bank_lock);
if (!map) {
pr_err("IPU: Interrupt on unmapped source %u bank %d\n",
......@@ -317,22 +317,22 @@ static void ipu_irq_fn(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
for (i = 0; i < IPU_IRQ_NR_FN_BANKS; i++) {
struct ipu_irq_bank *bank = irq_bank + i;
spin_lock(&bank_lock);
raw_spin_lock(&bank_lock);
status = ipu_read_reg(ipu, bank->status);
/* Not clearing all interrupts, see above */
status &= ipu_read_reg(ipu, bank->control);
spin_unlock(&bank_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&bank_lock);
while ((line = ffs(status))) {
struct ipu_irq_map *map;
line--;
status &= ~(1UL << line);
spin_lock(&bank_lock);
raw_spin_lock(&bank_lock);
map = src2map(32 * i + line);
if (map)
irq = map->irq;
spin_unlock(&bank_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&bank_lock);
if (!map) {
pr_err("IPU: Interrupt on unmapped source %u bank %d\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment