Commit 2a6d50b5 authored by Dave Marchevsky's avatar Dave Marchevsky Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Consider non-owning refs trusted

Recent discussions around default kptr "trustedness" led to changes such
as commit 6fcd486b ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the
verifier."). One of the conclusions of those discussions, as expressed
in code and comments in that patch, is that we'd like to move away from
'raw' PTR_TO_BTF_ID without some type flag or other register state
indicating trustedness. Although PTR_TRUSTED and PTR_UNTRUSTED flags mark
this state explicitly, the verifier currently considers trustedness
implied by other register state. For example, owning refs to graph
collection nodes must have a nonzero ref_obj_id, so they pass the
is_trusted_reg check despite having no explicit PTR_{UN}TRUSTED flag.
This patch makes trustedness of non-owning refs to graph collection
nodes explicit as well.

By definition, non-owning refs are currently trusted. Although the ref
has no control over pointee lifetime, due to non-owning ref clobbering
rules (see invalidate_non_owning_refs) dereferencing a non-owning ref is
safe in the critical section controlled by bpf_spin_lock associated with
its owning collection.

Note that the previous statement does not hold true for nodes with shared
ownership due to the use-after-free issue that this series is
addressing. True shared ownership was disabled by commit 7deca5ea
("bpf: Disable bpf_refcount_acquire kfunc calls until race conditions are fixed"),
though, so the statement holds for now. Further patches in the series will change
the trustedness state of non-owning refs before re-enabling
bpf_refcount_acquire.

Let's add NON_OWN_REF type flag to BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS such that a
non-owning ref reg state would pass is_trusted_reg check. Somewhat
surprisingly, this doesn't result in any change to user-visible
functionality elsewhere in the verifier: graph collection nodes are all
marked MEM_ALLOC, which tends to be handled in separate codepaths from
"raw" PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Regardless, let's be explicit here and document the
current state of things before changing it elsewhere in the series.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Acked-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821193311.3290257-3-davemarchevsky@fb.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent f0d991a0
...@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_prog_check_recur(const struct bpf_prog *prog) ...@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_prog_check_recur(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
} }
} }
#define BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS (MEM_ALLOC | PTR_TRUSTED) #define BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS (MEM_ALLOC | PTR_TRUSTED | NON_OWN_REF)
static inline bool bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(u32 type) static inline bool bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(u32 type)
{ {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment