Commit 2c957ff2 authored by Jack Morgenstein's avatar Jack Morgenstein Committed by David S. Miller

net/mlx4_core: Don't fail reg/unreg vlan for older guests

In upstream kernels under SRIOV, the vlan register/unregister calls
were NOPs (doing nothing and returning OK). We detect these old
calls from guests (via the comm channel), since previously the
port number in mlx4_register_vlan was passed (improperly) in the
out_param. This has been corrected so that the port number is now
passed in bits 8..15 of the in_modifier field.

For old calls, these bits will be zero, so if the passed port
number is zero, we can still look at the out_param field to see
if it contains a valid port number. If yes, the VM is running
an old driver.

Since for old drivers, the register/unregister_vlan wrappers were
NOPs, we continue this policy -- the reason being that upstream
had an additional bug in eth driver running on guests (where
procedure mlx4_en_vlan_rx_kill_vid() had the following code:

if (!mlx4_find_cached_vlan(mdev->dev, priv->port, vid, &idx))
        mlx4_unregister_vlan(mdev->dev, priv->port, idx);
else
        en_err(priv, "could not find vid %d in cache\n", vid);

On a VM, mlx4_find_cached_vlan() will always fail, since the
vlan cache is located on the Hypervisor; on guests it is empty.

Therefore, if we allow upstream guests to register vlans, we will
have vlan leakage since the unregister will never be performed.
Leaving vlan reg/unreg for old guest drivers as a NOP is not a
feature regression, since in upstream the register/unregister
vlan wrapper is a NOP.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJack Morgenstein <jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Signed-off-by: default avatarOr Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 4874080d
......@@ -1718,6 +1718,7 @@ static void mlx4_master_do_cmd(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, u8 cmd,
if (cmd == MLX4_COMM_CMD_RESET) {
mlx4_warn(dev, "Received reset from slave:%d\n", slave);
slave_state[slave].active = false;
slave_state[slave].old_vlan_api = false;
mlx4_master_deactivate_admin_state(priv, slave);
for (i = 0; i < MLX4_EVENT_TYPES_NUM; ++i) {
slave_state[slave].event_eq[i].eqn = -1;
......
......@@ -455,6 +455,7 @@ struct mlx4_slave_state {
u8 last_cmd;
u8 init_port_mask;
bool active;
bool old_vlan_api;
u8 function;
dma_addr_t vhcr_dma;
u16 mtu[MLX4_MAX_PORTS + 1];
......
......@@ -1555,15 +1555,26 @@ static void rem_slave_vlans(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave)
}
static int vlan_alloc_res(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, int op, int cmd,
u64 in_param, u64 *out_param, int port)
u64 in_param, u64 *out_param, int in_port)
{
struct mlx4_priv *priv = mlx4_priv(dev);
struct mlx4_slave_state *slave_state = priv->mfunc.master.slave_state;
int err;
u16 vlan;
int vlan_index;
int port;
port = !in_port ? get_param_l(out_param) : in_port;
if (!port || op != RES_OP_RESERVE_AND_MAP)
return -EINVAL;
/* upstream kernels had NOP for reg/unreg vlan. Continue this. */
if (!in_port && port > 0 && port <= dev->caps.num_ports) {
slave_state[slave].old_vlan_api = true;
return 0;
}
vlan = (u16) in_param;
err = __mlx4_register_vlan(dev, port, vlan, &vlan_index);
......@@ -1856,10 +1867,14 @@ static int mac_free_res(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, int op, int cmd,
static int vlan_free_res(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, int op, int cmd,
u64 in_param, u64 *out_param, int port)
{
struct mlx4_priv *priv = mlx4_priv(dev);
struct mlx4_slave_state *slave_state = priv->mfunc.master.slave_state;
int err = 0;
switch (op) {
case RES_OP_RESERVE_AND_MAP:
if (slave_state[slave].old_vlan_api)
return 0;
if (!port)
return -EINVAL;
vlan_del_from_slave(dev, slave, in_param, port);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment