Commit 2cc029a0 authored by Vincenzo Frascino's avatar Vincenzo Frascino Committed by Andrew Morton

arm64: mte: rename TCO routines

The TCO related routines are used in uaccess methods and
load_unaligned_zeropad() but are unrelated to both even if the naming
suggest otherwise.

Improve the readability of the code moving the away from uaccess.h and
pre-pending them with "mte".

[andreyknvl@google.com: drop __ from mte_disable/enable_tco names]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/74d26337b2360733956114069e96ff11c296a944.1680114854.git.andreyknvl@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a48e7adce1248c0f9603a457776d59daa0ef734b.1678491668.git.andreyknvl@google.comSigned-off-by: default avatarVincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Cc: Weizhao Ouyang <ouyangweizhao@zeku.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent 0eafff1c
......@@ -13,8 +13,73 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
/* Whether the MTE asynchronous mode is enabled. */
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mte_async_or_asymm_mode);
static inline bool system_uses_mte_async_or_asymm_mode(void)
{
return static_branch_unlikely(&mte_async_or_asymm_mode);
}
#else /* CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS */
static inline bool system_uses_mte_async_or_asymm_mode(void)
{
return false;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS */
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
/*
* The Tag Check Flag (TCF) mode for MTE is per EL, hence TCF0
* affects EL0 and TCF affects EL1 irrespective of which TTBR is
* used.
* The kernel accesses TTBR0 usually with LDTR/STTR instructions
* when UAO is available, so these would act as EL0 accesses using
* TCF0.
* However futex.h code uses exclusives which would be executed as
* EL1, this can potentially cause a tag check fault even if the
* user disables TCF0.
*
* To address the problem we set the PSTATE.TCO bit in uaccess_enable()
* and reset it in uaccess_disable().
*
* The Tag check override (TCO) bit disables temporarily the tag checking
* preventing the issue.
*/
static inline void mte_disable_tco(void)
{
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_TCO(0),
ARM64_MTE, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS));
}
static inline void mte_enable_tco(void)
{
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_TCO(1),
ARM64_MTE, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS));
}
/*
* These functions disable tag checking only if in MTE async mode
* since the sync mode generates exceptions synchronously and the
* nofault or load_unaligned_zeropad can handle them.
*/
static inline void __mte_disable_tco_async(void)
{
if (system_uses_mte_async_or_asymm_mode())
mte_disable_tco();
}
static inline void __mte_enable_tco_async(void)
{
if (system_uses_mte_async_or_asymm_mode())
mte_enable_tco();
}
/*
* These functions are meant to be only used from KASAN runtime through
* the arch_*() interface defined in asm/memory.h.
......@@ -138,6 +203,22 @@ void mte_enable_kernel_asymm(void);
#else /* CONFIG_ARM64_MTE */
static inline void mte_disable_tco(void)
{
}
static inline void mte_enable_tco(void)
{
}
static inline void __mte_disable_tco_async(void)
{
}
static inline void __mte_enable_tco_async(void)
{
}
static inline u8 mte_get_ptr_tag(void *ptr)
{
return 0xFF;
......
......@@ -178,14 +178,6 @@ static inline void mte_disable_tco_entry(struct task_struct *task)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
/* Whether the MTE asynchronous mode is enabled. */
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mte_async_or_asymm_mode);
static inline bool system_uses_mte_async_or_asymm_mode(void)
{
return static_branch_unlikely(&mte_async_or_asymm_mode);
}
void mte_check_tfsr_el1(void);
static inline void mte_check_tfsr_entry(void)
......@@ -212,10 +204,6 @@ static inline void mte_check_tfsr_exit(void)
mte_check_tfsr_el1();
}
#else
static inline bool system_uses_mte_async_or_asymm_mode(void)
{
return false;
}
static inline void mte_check_tfsr_el1(void)
{
}
......
......@@ -136,55 +136,9 @@ static inline void __uaccess_enable_hw_pan(void)
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN));
}
/*
* The Tag Check Flag (TCF) mode for MTE is per EL, hence TCF0
* affects EL0 and TCF affects EL1 irrespective of which TTBR is
* used.
* The kernel accesses TTBR0 usually with LDTR/STTR instructions
* when UAO is available, so these would act as EL0 accesses using
* TCF0.
* However futex.h code uses exclusives which would be executed as
* EL1, this can potentially cause a tag check fault even if the
* user disables TCF0.
*
* To address the problem we set the PSTATE.TCO bit in uaccess_enable()
* and reset it in uaccess_disable().
*
* The Tag check override (TCO) bit disables temporarily the tag checking
* preventing the issue.
*/
static inline void __uaccess_disable_tco(void)
{
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_TCO(0),
ARM64_MTE, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS));
}
static inline void __uaccess_enable_tco(void)
{
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_TCO(1),
ARM64_MTE, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS));
}
/*
* These functions disable tag checking only if in MTE async mode
* since the sync mode generates exceptions synchronously and the
* nofault or load_unaligned_zeropad can handle them.
*/
static inline void __uaccess_disable_tco_async(void)
{
if (system_uses_mte_async_or_asymm_mode())
__uaccess_disable_tco();
}
static inline void __uaccess_enable_tco_async(void)
{
if (system_uses_mte_async_or_asymm_mode())
__uaccess_enable_tco();
}
static inline void uaccess_disable_privileged(void)
{
__uaccess_disable_tco();
mte_disable_tco();
if (uaccess_ttbr0_disable())
return;
......@@ -194,7 +148,7 @@ static inline void uaccess_disable_privileged(void)
static inline void uaccess_enable_privileged(void)
{
__uaccess_enable_tco();
mte_enable_tco();
if (uaccess_ttbr0_enable())
return;
......@@ -302,8 +256,8 @@ do { \
#define get_user __get_user
/*
* We must not call into the scheduler between __uaccess_enable_tco_async() and
* __uaccess_disable_tco_async(). As `dst` and `src` may contain blocking
* We must not call into the scheduler between __mte_enable_tco_async() and
* __mte_disable_tco_async(). As `dst` and `src` may contain blocking
* functions, we must evaluate these outside of the critical section.
*/
#define __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label) \
......@@ -312,10 +266,10 @@ do { \
__typeof__(src) __gkn_src = (src); \
int __gkn_err = 0; \
\
__uaccess_enable_tco_async(); \
__mte_enable_tco_async(); \
__raw_get_mem("ldr", *((type *)(__gkn_dst)), \
(__force type *)(__gkn_src), __gkn_err, K); \
__uaccess_disable_tco_async(); \
__mte_disable_tco_async(); \
\
if (unlikely(__gkn_err)) \
goto err_label; \
......@@ -388,8 +342,8 @@ do { \
#define put_user __put_user
/*
* We must not call into the scheduler between __uaccess_enable_tco_async() and
* __uaccess_disable_tco_async(). As `dst` and `src` may contain blocking
* We must not call into the scheduler between __mte_enable_tco_async() and
* __mte_disable_tco_async(). As `dst` and `src` may contain blocking
* functions, we must evaluate these outside of the critical section.
*/
#define __put_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label) \
......@@ -398,10 +352,10 @@ do { \
__typeof__(src) __pkn_src = (src); \
int __pkn_err = 0; \
\
__uaccess_enable_tco_async(); \
__mte_enable_tco_async(); \
__raw_put_mem("str", *((type *)(__pkn_src)), \
(__force type *)(__pkn_dst), __pkn_err, K); \
__uaccess_disable_tco_async(); \
__mte_disable_tco_async(); \
\
if (unlikely(__pkn_err)) \
goto err_label; \
......
......@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static inline unsigned long load_unaligned_zeropad(const void *addr)
{
unsigned long ret;
__uaccess_enable_tco_async();
__mte_enable_tco_async();
/* Load word from unaligned pointer addr */
asm(
......@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static inline unsigned long load_unaligned_zeropad(const void *addr)
: "=&r" (ret)
: "r" (addr), "Q" (*(unsigned long *)addr));
__uaccess_disable_tco_async();
__mte_disable_tco_async();
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment