Commit 30b6777b authored by Swen Schillig's avatar Swen Schillig Committed by James Bottomley

[SCSI] zfcp: Fix check whether unchained ct_els is possible

A false check was performed whether an unchained ct_els
is possible or not.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSwen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
parent 5adcbeb3
...@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_sbals(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req, ...@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_sbals(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req,
} }
/* use single, unchained SBAL if it can hold the request */ /* use single, unchained SBAL if it can hold the request */
if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) || zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) { if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) && zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) {
zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_unchained(adapter->qdio, &req->qdio_req, zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_unchained(adapter->qdio, &req->qdio_req,
sg_req, sg_resp); sg_req, sg_resp);
return 0; return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment