Commit 3140c25c authored by Pavel Emelyanov's avatar Pavel Emelyanov Committed by David S. Miller

[NETNS][FRAGS]: Make the LRU list per namespace.

The inet_frags.lru_list is used for evicting only, so we have
to make it per-namespace, to evict only those fragments, who's
namespace exceeded its high threshold, but not the whole hash.
Besides, this helps to avoid long loops  in evictor.

The spinlock is not per-namespace because it protects the
hash table as well, which is global.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 3b4bc4a2
......@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
struct netns_frags {
int nqueues;
atomic_t mem;
struct list_head lru_list;
/* sysctls */
int timeout;
......@@ -32,7 +33,6 @@ struct inet_frag_queue {
#define INETFRAGS_HASHSZ 64
struct inet_frags {
struct list_head lru_list;
struct hlist_head hash[INETFRAGS_HASHSZ];
rwlock_t lock;
u32 rnd;
......
......@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ void inet_frags_init(struct inet_frags *f)
for (i = 0; i < INETFRAGS_HASHSZ; i++)
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&f->hash[i]);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&f->lru_list);
rwlock_init(&f->lock);
f->rnd = (u32) ((num_physpages ^ (num_physpages>>7)) ^
......@@ -74,6 +73,7 @@ void inet_frags_init_net(struct netns_frags *nf)
{
nf->nqueues = 0;
atomic_set(&nf->mem, 0);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nf->lru_list);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_frags_init_net);
......@@ -156,12 +156,12 @@ int inet_frag_evictor(struct netns_frags *nf, struct inet_frags *f)
work = atomic_read(&nf->mem) - nf->low_thresh;
while (work > 0) {
read_lock(&f->lock);
if (list_empty(&f->lru_list)) {
if (list_empty(&nf->lru_list)) {
read_unlock(&f->lock);
break;
}
q = list_first_entry(&f->lru_list,
q = list_first_entry(&nf->lru_list,
struct inet_frag_queue, lru_list);
atomic_inc(&q->refcnt);
read_unlock(&f->lock);
......@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static struct inet_frag_queue *inet_frag_intern(struct netns_frags *nf,
atomic_inc(&qp->refcnt);
hlist_add_head(&qp->list, &f->hash[hash]);
list_add_tail(&qp->lru_list, &f->lru_list);
list_add_tail(&qp->lru_list, &nf->lru_list);
nf->nqueues++;
write_unlock(&f->lock);
return qp;
......
......@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
return ip_frag_reasm(qp, prev, dev);
write_lock(&ip4_frags.lock);
list_move_tail(&qp->q.lru_list, &ip4_frags.lru_list);
list_move_tail(&qp->q.lru_list, &qp->q.net->lru_list);
write_unlock(&ip4_frags.lock);
return -EINPROGRESS;
......
......@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static int nf_ct_frag6_queue(struct nf_ct_frag6_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
fq->q.last_in |= FIRST_IN;
}
write_lock(&nf_frags.lock);
list_move_tail(&fq->q.lru_list, &nf_frags.lru_list);
list_move_tail(&fq->q.lru_list, &nf_init_frags.lru_list);
write_unlock(&nf_frags.lock);
return 0;
......
......@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static int ip6_frag_queue(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
return ip6_frag_reasm(fq, prev, dev);
write_lock(&ip6_frags.lock);
list_move_tail(&fq->q.lru_list, &ip6_frags.lru_list);
list_move_tail(&fq->q.lru_list, &fq->q.net->lru_list);
write_unlock(&ip6_frags.lock);
return -1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment