Commit 3186b618 authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/nmi: Upgrade NMI backtrace stall checks & messages

The commit to improve NMI stall debuggability:

  344da544 ("x86/nmi: Print reasons why backtrace NMIs are ignored")

... has shown value, but widespread use has also identified a few
opportunities for improvement.

The systems have (as usual) shown far more creativity than that commit's
author, demonstrating yet again that failing CPUs can do whatever they want.

In addition, the current message format is less friendly than one might
like to those attempting to use these messages to identify failing CPUs.

Therefore, separately flag CPUs that, during the full time that the
stack-backtrace request was waiting, were always in an NMI handler,
were never in an NMI handler, or exited one NMI handler.

Also, split the message identifying the CPU and the time since that CPU's
last NMI-related activity so that a single line identifies the CPU without
any other variable information, greatly reducing the processing overhead
required to identify repeat-offender CPUs.
Co-developed-by: default avatarBreno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBreno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ab4d70c8-c874-42dc-b206-643018922393@paulmck-laptop
parent b6540de9
......@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(asm_exc_nmi_kvm_vmx);
static char *nmi_check_stall_msg[] = {
/* */
/* +--------- nsp->idt_seq_snap & 0x1: CPU is in NMI handler. */
/* +--------- nmi_seq & 0x1: CPU is currently in NMI handler. */
/* | +------ cpu_is_offline(cpu) */
/* | | +--- nsp->idt_calls_snap != atomic_long_read(&nsp->idt_calls): */
/* | | | NMI handler has been invoked. */
......@@ -628,22 +628,26 @@ void nmi_backtrace_stall_check(const struct cpumask *btp)
nmi_seq = READ_ONCE(nsp->idt_nmi_seq);
if (nsp->idt_nmi_seq_snap + 1 == nmi_seq && (nmi_seq & 0x1)) {
msgp = "CPU entered NMI handler function, but has not exited";
} else if ((nsp->idt_nmi_seq_snap & 0x1) != (nmi_seq & 0x1)) {
msgp = "CPU is handling NMIs";
} else {
idx = ((nsp->idt_seq_snap & 0x1) << 2) |
} else if (nsp->idt_nmi_seq_snap == nmi_seq ||
nsp->idt_nmi_seq_snap + 1 == nmi_seq) {
idx = ((nmi_seq & 0x1) << 2) |
(cpu_is_offline(cpu) << 1) |
(nsp->idt_calls_snap != atomic_long_read(&nsp->idt_calls));
msgp = nmi_check_stall_msg[idx];
if (nsp->idt_ignored_snap != READ_ONCE(nsp->idt_ignored) && (idx & 0x1))
modp = ", but OK because ignore_nmis was set";
if (nmi_seq & 0x1)
msghp = " (CPU currently in NMI handler function)";
else if (nsp->idt_nmi_seq_snap + 1 == nmi_seq)
if (nsp->idt_nmi_seq_snap + 1 == nmi_seq)
msghp = " (CPU exited one NMI handler function)";
else if (nmi_seq & 0x1)
msghp = " (CPU currently in NMI handler function)";
else
msghp = " (CPU was never in an NMI handler function)";
} else {
msgp = "CPU is handling NMIs";
}
pr_alert("%s: CPU %d: %s%s%s, last activity: %lu jiffies ago.\n",
__func__, cpu, msgp, modp, msghp, j - READ_ONCE(nsp->recv_jiffies));
pr_alert("%s: CPU %d: %s%s%s\n", __func__, cpu, msgp, modp, msghp);
pr_alert("%s: last activity: %lu jiffies ago.\n",
__func__, j - READ_ONCE(nsp->recv_jiffies));
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment