Commit 31e92739 authored by Amadeusz Sławiński's avatar Amadeusz Sławiński Committed by Mark Brown

ASoC: topology: Use unload() op directly

struct snd_soc_dobj only needs pointer to the unload function, instead
however, there is pointer to all topology operations. Change code to use
the function pointer instead of pointer to structure containing all
operations.
Reviewed-by: default avatarCezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRanjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAmadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127231111.937721-12-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent fdfa3661
......@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct snd_soc_dobj {
enum snd_soc_dobj_type type;
unsigned int index; /* objects can belong in different groups */
struct list_head list;
struct snd_soc_tplg_ops *ops;
int (*unload)(struct snd_soc_component *comp, struct snd_soc_dobj *dobj);
union {
struct snd_soc_dobj_control control;
struct snd_soc_dobj_widget widget;
......
......@@ -359,8 +359,8 @@ static void soc_tplg_remove_kcontrol(struct snd_soc_component *comp, struct snd_
if (pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_CONTROL)
return;
if (dobj->ops && dobj->ops->control_unload)
dobj->ops->control_unload(comp, dobj);
if (dobj->unload)
dobj->unload(comp, dobj);
snd_ctl_remove(card, dobj->control.kcontrol);
list_del(&dobj->list);
......@@ -373,8 +373,8 @@ static void soc_tplg_remove_route(struct snd_soc_component *comp,
if (pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH)
return;
if (dobj->ops && dobj->ops->dapm_route_unload)
dobj->ops->dapm_route_unload(comp, dobj);
if (dobj->unload)
dobj->unload(comp, dobj);
list_del(&dobj->list);
}
......@@ -391,8 +391,8 @@ static void soc_tplg_remove_widget(struct snd_soc_component *comp,
if (pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET)
return;
if (dobj->ops && dobj->ops->widget_unload)
dobj->ops->widget_unload(comp, dobj);
if (dobj->unload)
dobj->unload(comp, dobj);
if (!w->kcontrols)
goto free_news;
......@@ -418,8 +418,8 @@ static void soc_tplg_remove_dai(struct snd_soc_component *comp,
if (pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI)
return;
if (dobj->ops && dobj->ops->dai_unload)
dobj->ops->dai_unload(comp, dobj);
if (dobj->unload)
dobj->unload(comp, dobj);
for_each_component_dais_safe(comp, dai, _dai)
if (dai->driver == dai_drv)
......@@ -438,8 +438,8 @@ static void soc_tplg_remove_link(struct snd_soc_component *comp,
if (pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI)
return;
if (dobj->ops && dobj->ops->link_unload)
dobj->ops->link_unload(comp, dobj);
if (dobj->unload)
dobj->unload(comp, dobj);
list_del(&dobj->list);
snd_soc_remove_pcm_runtime(comp->card,
......@@ -453,8 +453,8 @@ static void remove_backend_link(struct snd_soc_component *comp,
if (pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK)
return;
if (dobj->ops && dobj->ops->link_unload)
dobj->ops->link_unload(comp, dobj);
if (dobj->unload)
dobj->unload(comp, dobj);
/*
* We don't free the link here as what soc_tplg_remove_link() do since BE
......@@ -678,7 +678,8 @@ static int soc_tplg_dbytes_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg, size_t size)
sbe->max = le32_to_cpu(be->max);
sbe->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_BYTES;
sbe->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
if (tplg->ops)
sbe->dobj.unload = tplg->ops->control_unload;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbe->dobj.list);
/* map io handlers */
......@@ -754,8 +755,9 @@ static int soc_tplg_dmixer_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg, size_t size)
sm->invert = le32_to_cpu(mc->invert);
sm->platform_max = le32_to_cpu(mc->platform_max);
sm->dobj.index = tplg->index;
sm->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
sm->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_MIXER;
if (tplg->ops)
sm->dobj.unload = tplg->ops->control_unload;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sm->dobj.list);
/* map io handlers */
......@@ -900,7 +902,8 @@ static int soc_tplg_denum_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg, size_t size)
se->mask = le32_to_cpu(ec->mask);
se->dobj.index = tplg->index;
se->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_ENUM;
se->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
if (tplg->ops)
se->dobj.unload = tplg->ops->control_unload;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&se->dobj.list);
switch (le32_to_cpu(ec->hdr.ops.info)) {
......@@ -1077,7 +1080,8 @@ static int soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
/* add route dobj to dobj_list */
route->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_GRAPH;
route->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
if (tplg->ops)
route->dobj.unload = tplg->ops->control_unload;
route->dobj.index = tplg->index;
list_add(&route->dobj.list, &tplg->comp->dobj_list);
......@@ -1443,7 +1447,8 @@ static int soc_tplg_dapm_widget_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
widget->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_WIDGET;
widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type = kcontrol_type;
widget->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
if (tplg->ops)
widget->dobj.unload = tplg->ops->widget_unload;
widget->dobj.index = tplg->index;
list_add(&widget->dobj.list, &tplg->comp->dobj_list);
......@@ -1621,8 +1626,9 @@ static int soc_tplg_dai_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
}
dai_drv->dobj.index = tplg->index;
dai_drv->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
dai_drv->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_PCM;
if (tplg->ops)
dai_drv->dobj.unload = tplg->ops->dai_unload;
list_add(&dai_drv->dobj.list, &tplg->comp->dobj_list);
/* register the DAI to the component */
......@@ -1691,8 +1697,9 @@ static int soc_tplg_fe_link_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
link->num_platforms = 1;
link->dobj.index = tplg->index;
link->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
link->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_DAI_LINK;
if (tplg->ops)
link->dobj.unload = tplg->ops->link_unload;
if (strlen(pcm->pcm_name)) {
link->name = devm_kstrdup(tplg->dev, pcm->pcm_name, GFP_KERNEL);
......@@ -2099,8 +2106,9 @@ static int soc_tplg_link_config(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
/* for unloading it in snd_soc_tplg_component_remove */
link->dobj.index = tplg->index;
link->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
link->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_BACKEND_LINK;
if (tplg->ops)
link->dobj.unload = tplg->ops->link_unload;
list_add(&link->dobj.list, &tplg->comp->dobj_list);
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment