Commit 349bff48 authored by Andy Shevchenko's avatar Andy Shevchenko Committed by Hans de Goede

platform/x86/intel: punit_ipc: Drop wrong use of ACPI_PTR()

ACPI_PTR() is more harmful than helpful. For example, in this case
if CONFIG_ACPI=n, the ID table left unused which is not what we want.

Instead of adding ifdeffery here and there, drop ACPI_PTR()
and unused acpi.h.

Fixes: fdca4f16 ("platform:x86: add Intel P-Unit mailbox IPC driver")
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210827145310.76239-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
parent 6880fa6c
......@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
* which provide mailbox interface for power management usage.
*/
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
......@@ -319,7 +318,7 @@ static struct platform_driver intel_punit_ipc_driver = {
.remove = intel_punit_ipc_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "intel_punit_ipc",
.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(punit_ipc_acpi_ids),
.acpi_match_table = punit_ipc_acpi_ids,
},
};
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment