Commit 35478d05 authored by Qu Wenruo's avatar Qu Wenruo Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: use nodesize to determine if we need readahead in btrfs_lookup_bio_sums

In btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() if the bio is pretty large, we want to
start readahead in the csum tree.

However the threshold is an immediate number, (PAGE_SIZE * 8), from the
initial btrfs merge.

The meaning of the value is pretty hard to guess, especially when the
immediate number is from the times when 4K sectorsize was the default
and only CRC32C was supported.

For the most common btrfs setup, CRC32 csum and 4K sectorsize,
it means just 32K read would kick readahead, while the csum itself is
only 32 bytes in size.

Now let's be more reasonable by taking both csum size and node size into
consideration.

If the csum size for the bio is larger than one leaf, then we kick the
readahead.  This means for current default btrfs, the threshold will be
16M.

This change should not change performance observably, thus this is
mostly a readability enhancement.
Reviewed-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 829ddec9
......@@ -297,7 +297,11 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
csum = dst;
}
if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size > PAGE_SIZE * 8)
/*
* If requested number of sectors is larger than one leaf can contain,
* kick the readahead for csum tree.
*/
if (nblocks > fs_info->csums_per_leaf)
path->reada = READA_FORWARD;
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment