drm/xe: Introduce xe_reg/xe_reg_mcr
Stop using i915 types for registers. Use our own types. Differently from i915, this will keep under the register definition the knowledge for the different types of registers. For now, the "flags"/"options" are mcr and masked, although only the former is being used. Additionally MCR registers have their own type. The only place that should really look inside a xe_mcr_reg_t is that code dealing with the steering and using other APIs when the register is MCR has been a source of problem in the past. Most of the driver is agnostic to the register differences since they either use the definition from the header or already call the correct MCR_REG()/_MMIO() macros. By embeding the struct xe_reg inside the struct it's also possible to guarantee the compiler will break if using RANDOM_MCR_REG.reg is attempted, since now the u32 is inside the inner struct. v2: - Deep a dedicated type for MCR registers to avoid misuse (Matt Roper, Jani) - Drop the typedef and just use a struct since it's not an opaque type (Jani) - Add more kernel-doc v3: - Use only 22 bits for the register address since all the platforms supported so far have only 4MB of MMIO per tile (Matt Roper) Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230427223256.1432787-7-lucas.demarchi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment