Commit 37f08be1 authored by Marcos Paulo de Souza's avatar Marcos Paulo de Souza Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

PM / Freezer: Remove references to TIF_FREEZE in comments

This patch removes all the references in the code about the TIF_FREEZE
flag removed by commit a3201227

    freezer: make freezing() test freeze conditions in effect instead of TIF_FREEZE

There still are some references to TIF_FREEZE in
Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt, but it looks like that
documentation needs more thorough work to reflect how the new
freezer works, and hence merely removing the references to TIF_FREEZE
won't really help. So I have not touched that part in this patch.
Suggested-by: default avatarSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
parent 8671bbc1
......@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ void daemonize(const char *name, ...)
*/
exit_mm(current);
/*
* We don't want to have TIF_FREEZE set if the system-wide hibernation
* We don't want to get frozen, in case system-wide hibernation
* or suspend transition begins right now.
*/
current->flags |= (PF_NOFREEZE | PF_KTHREAD);
......
......@@ -99,9 +99,9 @@ static void fake_signal_wake_up(struct task_struct *p)
* freeze_task - send a freeze request to given task
* @p: task to send the request to
*
* If @p is freezing, the freeze request is sent by setting %TIF_FREEZE
* flag and either sending a fake signal to it or waking it up, depending
* on whether it has %PF_FREEZER_NOSIG set.
* If @p is freezing, the freeze request is sent either by sending a fake
* signal (if it's not a kernel thread) or waking it up (if it's a kernel
* thread).
*
* RETURNS:
* %false, if @p is not freezing or already frozen; %true, otherwise
......
......@@ -53,11 +53,9 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only)
* It is "frozen enough". If the task does wake
* up, it will immediately call try_to_freeze.
*
* Because freeze_task() goes through p's
* scheduler lock after setting TIF_FREEZE, it's
* guaranteed that either we see TASK_RUNNING or
* try_to_stop() after schedule() in ptrace/signal
* stop sees TIF_FREEZE.
* Because freeze_task() goes through p's scheduler lock, it's
* guaranteed that TASK_STOPPED/TRACED -> TASK_RUNNING
* transition can't race with task state testing here.
*/
if (!task_is_stopped_or_traced(p) &&
!freezer_should_skip(p))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment