Commit 38967f42 authored by Paolo Abeni's avatar Paolo Abeni Committed by Jakub Kicinski

mptcp: track some aggregate data counters

Currently there are no data transfer counters accounting for all
the subflows used by a given MPTCP socket. The user-space can compute
such figures aggregating the subflow info, but that is inaccurate
if any subflow is closed before the MPTCP socket itself.

Add the new counters in the MPTCP socket itself and expose them
via the existing diag and sockopt. While touching mptcp_diag_fill_info(),
acquire the relevant locks before fetching the msk data, to ensure
better data consistency

Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/385Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMatthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent c026d33b
......@@ -123,6 +123,11 @@ struct mptcp_info {
__u8 mptcpi_local_addr_used;
__u8 mptcpi_local_addr_max;
__u8 mptcpi_csum_enabled;
__u32 mptcpi_retransmits;
__u64 mptcpi_bytes_retrans;
__u64 mptcpi_bytes_sent;
__u64 mptcpi_bytes_received;
__u64 mptcpi_bytes_acked;
};
/*
......
......@@ -1026,6 +1026,12 @@ u64 __mptcp_expand_seq(u64 old_seq, u64 cur_seq)
return cur_seq;
}
static void __mptcp_snd_una_update(struct mptcp_sock *msk, u64 new_snd_una)
{
msk->bytes_acked += new_snd_una - msk->snd_una;
msk->snd_una = new_snd_una;
}
static void ack_update_msk(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
struct sock *ssk,
struct mptcp_options_received *mp_opt)
......@@ -1057,7 +1063,7 @@ static void ack_update_msk(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
__mptcp_check_push(sk, ssk);
if (after64(new_snd_una, old_snd_una)) {
msk->snd_una = new_snd_una;
__mptcp_snd_una_update(msk, new_snd_una);
__mptcp_data_acked(sk);
}
mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
......@@ -1123,7 +1129,7 @@ bool mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
/* on fallback we just need to ignore the msk-level snd_una, as
* this is really plain TCP
*/
msk->snd_una = READ_ONCE(msk->snd_nxt);
__mptcp_snd_una_update(msk, READ_ONCE(msk->snd_nxt));
__mptcp_data_acked(subflow->conn);
mptcp_data_unlock(subflow->conn);
......
......@@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk,
if (MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq == msk->ack_seq) {
/* in sequence */
msk->bytes_received += copy_len;
WRITE_ONCE(msk->ack_seq, msk->ack_seq + copy_len);
tail = skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
if (tail && mptcp_try_coalesce(sk, tail, skb))
......@@ -760,6 +761,7 @@ static bool __mptcp_ofo_queue(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq += delta;
__skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
}
msk->bytes_received += end_seq - msk->ack_seq;
msk->ack_seq = end_seq;
moved = true;
}
......@@ -1531,8 +1533,10 @@ static void mptcp_update_post_push(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
* that has been handed to the subflow for transmission
* and skip update in case it was old dfrag.
*/
if (likely(after64(snd_nxt_new, msk->snd_nxt)))
if (likely(after64(snd_nxt_new, msk->snd_nxt))) {
msk->bytes_sent += snd_nxt_new - msk->snd_nxt;
msk->snd_nxt = snd_nxt_new;
}
}
void mptcp_check_and_set_pending(struct sock *sk)
......@@ -2590,6 +2594,7 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
}
if (copied) {
dfrag->already_sent = max(dfrag->already_sent, info.sent);
msk->bytes_retrans += copied;
tcp_push(ssk, 0, info.mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle,
info.size_goal);
WRITE_ONCE(msk->allow_infinite_fallback, false);
......@@ -3102,6 +3107,10 @@ static int mptcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags)
WRITE_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled, mptcp_is_checksum_enabled(sock_net(sk)));
mptcp_pm_data_reset(msk);
mptcp_ca_reset(sk);
msk->bytes_acked = 0;
msk->bytes_received = 0;
msk->bytes_sent = 0;
msk->bytes_retrans = 0;
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_shutdown, 0);
sk_error_report(sk);
......
......@@ -262,10 +262,13 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
u64 local_key;
u64 remote_key;
u64 write_seq;
u64 bytes_sent;
u64 snd_nxt;
u64 bytes_received;
u64 ack_seq;
atomic64_t rcv_wnd_sent;
u64 rcv_data_fin_seq;
u64 bytes_retrans;
int rmem_fwd_alloc;
struct sock *last_snd;
int snd_burst;
......@@ -274,6 +277,7 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
* recovery related fields are under data_lock
* protection
*/
u64 bytes_acked;
u64 snd_una;
u64 wnd_end;
unsigned long timer_ival;
......
......@@ -889,7 +889,9 @@ static int mptcp_getsockopt_first_sf_only(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int level, int
void mptcp_diag_fill_info(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_info *info)
{
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
u32 flags = 0;
bool slow;
memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
......@@ -898,6 +900,9 @@ void mptcp_diag_fill_info(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_info *info)
info->mptcpi_add_addr_accepted = READ_ONCE(msk->pm.add_addr_accepted);
info->mptcpi_local_addr_used = READ_ONCE(msk->pm.local_addr_used);
if (inet_sk_state_load(sk) == TCP_LISTEN)
return;
/* The following limits only make sense for the in-kernel PM */
if (mptcp_pm_is_kernel(msk)) {
info->mptcpi_subflows_max =
......@@ -915,11 +920,21 @@ void mptcp_diag_fill_info(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_info *info)
if (READ_ONCE(msk->can_ack))
flags |= MPTCP_INFO_FLAG_REMOTE_KEY_RECEIVED;
info->mptcpi_flags = flags;
info->mptcpi_token = READ_ONCE(msk->token);
info->mptcpi_write_seq = READ_ONCE(msk->write_seq);
info->mptcpi_snd_una = READ_ONCE(msk->snd_una);
info->mptcpi_rcv_nxt = READ_ONCE(msk->ack_seq);
info->mptcpi_csum_enabled = READ_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled);
mptcp_data_lock(sk);
info->mptcpi_snd_una = msk->snd_una;
info->mptcpi_rcv_nxt = msk->ack_seq;
info->mptcpi_bytes_acked = msk->bytes_acked;
mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
slow = lock_sock_fast(sk);
info->mptcpi_csum_enabled = msk->csum_enabled;
info->mptcpi_token = msk->token;
info->mptcpi_write_seq = msk->write_seq;
info->mptcpi_retransmits = inet_csk(sk)->icsk_retransmits;
info->mptcpi_bytes_sent = msk->bytes_sent;
info->mptcpi_bytes_received = msk->bytes_received;
info->mptcpi_bytes_retrans = msk->bytes_retrans;
unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mptcp_diag_fill_info);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment