Commit 39071e6f authored by Trond Myklebust's avatar Trond Myklebust

NFSv4: Fix atomicity problems with lock stateid updates

When we update the lock stateid, we really do need to ensure that this is
done under the state->state_lock, and that we are indeed only updating
confirmed locks with a newer version of the same stateid.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
parent 63f5f796
...@@ -1297,6 +1297,23 @@ static int update_open_stateid(struct nfs4_state *state, nfs4_stateid *open_stat ...@@ -1297,6 +1297,23 @@ static int update_open_stateid(struct nfs4_state *state, nfs4_stateid *open_stat
return ret; return ret;
} }
static bool nfs4_update_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp,
const nfs4_stateid *stateid)
{
struct nfs4_state *state = lsp->ls_state;
bool ret = false;
spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
if (!nfs4_stateid_match_other(stateid, &lsp->ls_stateid))
goto out_noupdate;
if (!nfs4_stateid_is_newer(stateid, &lsp->ls_stateid))
goto out_noupdate;
nfs4_stateid_copy(&lsp->ls_stateid, stateid);
ret = true;
out_noupdate:
spin_unlock(&state->state_lock);
return ret;
}
static void nfs4_return_incompatible_delegation(struct inode *inode, fmode_t fmode) static void nfs4_return_incompatible_delegation(struct inode *inode, fmode_t fmode)
{ {
...@@ -5403,9 +5420,9 @@ static void nfs4_locku_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) ...@@ -5403,9 +5420,9 @@ static void nfs4_locku_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
return; return;
switch (task->tk_status) { switch (task->tk_status) {
case 0: case 0:
nfs4_stateid_copy(&calldata->lsp->ls_stateid,
&calldata->res.stateid);
renew_lease(calldata->server, calldata->timestamp); renew_lease(calldata->server, calldata->timestamp);
nfs4_update_lock_stateid(calldata->lsp,
&calldata->res.stateid);
break; break;
case -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID: case -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID:
case -NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID: case -NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID:
...@@ -5626,6 +5643,7 @@ static void nfs4_lock_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata) ...@@ -5626,6 +5643,7 @@ static void nfs4_lock_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
static void nfs4_lock_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata) static void nfs4_lock_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
{ {
struct nfs4_lockdata *data = calldata; struct nfs4_lockdata *data = calldata;
struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp = data->lsp;
dprintk("%s: begin!\n", __func__); dprintk("%s: begin!\n", __func__);
...@@ -5633,18 +5651,16 @@ static void nfs4_lock_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata) ...@@ -5633,18 +5651,16 @@ static void nfs4_lock_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
return; return;
data->rpc_status = task->tk_status; data->rpc_status = task->tk_status;
if (data->arg.new_lock_owner != 0) { if (task->tk_status == 0) {
if (data->rpc_status == 0) renew_lease(NFS_SERVER(data->ctx->dentry->d_inode),
nfs_confirm_seqid(&data->lsp->ls_seqid, 0); data->timestamp);
else if (data->arg.new_lock_owner != 0) {
goto out; nfs_confirm_seqid(&lsp->ls_seqid, 0);
} nfs4_stateid_copy(&lsp->ls_stateid, &data->res.stateid);
if (data->rpc_status == 0) { set_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &lsp->ls_flags);
nfs4_stateid_copy(&data->lsp->ls_stateid, &data->res.stateid); } else if (!nfs4_update_lock_stateid(lsp, &data->res.stateid))
set_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &data->lsp->ls_flags); rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
renew_lease(NFS_SERVER(data->ctx->dentry->d_inode), data->timestamp);
} }
out:
dprintk("%s: done, ret = %d!\n", __func__, data->rpc_status); dprintk("%s: done, ret = %d!\n", __func__, data->rpc_status);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment