Commit 3a2daa72 authored by Pu Lehui's avatar Pu Lehui Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Make some symbols static

The sparse tool complains as follows:

kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4567:29: warning:
 symbol 'bpf_sys_bpf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4592:29: warning:
 symbol 'bpf_sys_close_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?

This symbol is not used outside of syscall.c, so marks it static.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210519064116.240536-1-pulehui@huawei.com
parent 5d67f349
...@@ -4563,7 +4563,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_sys_bpf, int, cmd, void *, attr, u32, attr_size) ...@@ -4563,7 +4563,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_sys_bpf, int, cmd, void *, attr, u32, attr_size)
return __sys_bpf(cmd, KERNEL_BPFPTR(attr), attr_size); return __sys_bpf(cmd, KERNEL_BPFPTR(attr), attr_size);
} }
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_bpf_proto = { static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_bpf_proto = {
.func = bpf_sys_bpf, .func = bpf_sys_bpf,
.gpl_only = false, .gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER, .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
...@@ -4588,7 +4588,7 @@ BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sys_close, u32, fd) ...@@ -4588,7 +4588,7 @@ BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sys_close, u32, fd)
return close_fd(fd); return close_fd(fd);
} }
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_close_proto = { static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_close_proto = {
.func = bpf_sys_close, .func = bpf_sys_close,
.gpl_only = false, .gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER, .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment