Commit 3b88cc0d authored by Ben Widawsky's avatar Ben Widawsky Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: use __wait_seqno for ring throttle

It turns out throttle had an almost identical  bit of code to do the
wait. Now we can call the new helper directly.  This is just a bonus,
and not needed for the overall series.

v2: remove irq_get/put which is now in __wait_seqno (Ben)
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 4146b08d
......@@ -2981,25 +2981,7 @@ i915_gem_ring_throttle(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
if (seqno == 0)
return 0;
ret = 0;
if (!i915_seqno_passed(ring->get_seqno(ring), seqno)) {
/* And wait for the seqno passing without holding any locks and
* causing extra latency for others. This is safe as the irq
* generation is designed to be run atomically and so is
* lockless.
*/
if (ring->irq_get(ring)) {
ret = wait_event_interruptible(ring->irq_queue,
i915_seqno_passed(ring->get_seqno(ring), seqno)
|| atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged));
ring->irq_put(ring);
if (ret == 0 && atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged))
ret = -EIO;
} else
ret = -EBUSY;
}
ret = __wait_seqno(ring, seqno, true);
if (ret == 0)
queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq, &dev_priv->mm.retire_work, 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment