Commit 3b9cf790 authored by Stefan M Schaeckeler's avatar Stefan M Schaeckeler Committed by Rob Herring

of: unittest: for strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field

For strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field:

This is consistent with how dtc builds string properties.

Function __of_prop_dup() would misbehave on such properties as it duplicates
properties based on the property length field creating new string values
without trailing \0s.
Signed-off-by: default avatarStefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarFrank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Tested-by: default avatarFrank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
parent 3098e5b7
...@@ -165,20 +165,20 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(void) ...@@ -165,20 +165,20 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(void)
/* Add a new property - should pass*/ /* Add a new property - should pass*/
prop->name = "new-property"; prop->name = "new-property";
prop->value = "new-property-data"; prop->value = "new-property-data";
prop->length = strlen(prop->value); prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) == 0, "Adding a new property failed\n"); unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) == 0, "Adding a new property failed\n");
/* Try to add an existing property - should fail */ /* Try to add an existing property - should fail */
prop++; prop++;
prop->name = "new-property"; prop->name = "new-property";
prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail"; prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
prop->length = strlen(prop->value); prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) != 0, unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) != 0,
"Adding an existing property should have failed\n"); "Adding an existing property should have failed\n");
/* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */ /* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */
prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass"; prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
prop->length = strlen(prop->value); prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0, unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
"Updating an existing property should have passed\n"); "Updating an existing property should have passed\n");
...@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(void) ...@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(void)
prop++; prop++;
prop->name = "modify-property"; prop->name = "modify-property";
prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass"; prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
prop->length = strlen(prop->value); prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0, unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
"Updating a missing property should have passed\n"); "Updating a missing property should have passed\n");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment