scsi: stop passing a gfp_mask argument down the command setup path
There is no reason for ULDs to pass in a flag on how to allocate the S/G lists. While we don't need GFP_ATOMIC for the blk-mq case because we don't hold locks, that decision can be made way down the chain without having to pass a pointless gfp_mask argument. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment