Commit 3df82dd4 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Only warn for might_sleep() before a slow wait_for_register

As intel_wait_for_register_fw() may use, and if successful only use, a
busy-wait loop, the might_sleep() warning is a little over-zealous.
Restrict it to a might_sleep_if() a slow timeout is specified (and so
the caller authorises use of a usleep).
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180329224519.13598-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent 5807e1c2
......@@ -1996,7 +1996,7 @@ int __intel_wait_for_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
u32 reg_value;
int ret;
might_sleep();
might_sleep_if(slow_timeout_ms);
spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, fw);
......@@ -2008,7 +2008,7 @@ int __intel_wait_for_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, fw);
spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
if (ret)
if (ret && slow_timeout_ms)
ret = __wait_for(reg_value = I915_READ_NOTRACE(reg),
(reg_value & mask) == value,
slow_timeout_ms * 1000, 10, 1000);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment