Commit 3e6dc119 authored by Michal Wilczynski's avatar Michal Wilczynski Committed by Tony Nguyen

ice: Fix check for weight and priority of a scheduling node

Currently checks for weight and priority ranges don't check incoming value
from the devlink. Instead it checks node current weight or priority. This
makes those checks useless.

Change range checks in ice_set_object_tx_priority() and
ice_set_object_tx_weight() to check against incoming priority an weight.

Fixes: 42c2eb6b ("ice: Implement devlink-rate API")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPaul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Tested-by: Gurucharan G <gurucharanx.g@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
parent 2038cc59
......@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static int ice_set_object_tx_priority(struct ice_port_info *pi, struct ice_sched
{
int status;
if (node->tx_priority >= 8) {
if (priority >= 8) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Priority should be less than 8");
return -EINVAL;
}
......@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int ice_set_object_tx_weight(struct ice_port_info *pi, struct ice_sched_n
{
int status;
if (node->tx_weight > 200 || node->tx_weight < 1) {
if (weight > 200 || weight < 1) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Weight must be between 1 and 200");
return -EINVAL;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment