Commit 3ef64143 authored by Filipe Manana's avatar Filipe Manana Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: remove no longer used trans_list member of struct btrfs_ordered_extent

The 'trans_list' member of an ordered extent was used to keep track of the
ordered extents for which a transaction commit had to wait. These were
ordered extents that were started and logged by an fsync. However we don't
do that anymore and before we stopped doing it we changed the approach to
wait for the ordered extents in commit 161c3549 ("Btrfs: change how
we wait for pending ordered extents"), which stopped using that list and
therefore the 'trans_list' member is not used anymore since that commit.
So just remove it since it's doing nothing and making each ordered extent
structure waste memory (2 pointers).
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent cd8d39f4
......@@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ static int __btrfs_add_ordered_extent(struct inode *inode, u64 file_offset,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->root_extent_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->work_list);
init_completion(&entry->completion);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->trans_list);
trace_btrfs_ordered_extent_add(inode, entry);
......@@ -448,7 +447,6 @@ void btrfs_put_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *entry)
trace_btrfs_ordered_extent_put(entry->inode, entry);
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&entry->refs)) {
ASSERT(list_empty(&entry->trans_list));
ASSERT(list_empty(&entry->root_extent_list));
ASSERT(RB_EMPTY_NODE(&entry->rb_node));
if (entry->inode)
......
......@@ -104,9 +104,6 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent {
/* list of checksums for insertion when the extent io is done */
struct list_head list;
/* If the transaction needs to wait on this ordered extent */
struct list_head trans_list;
/* used to wait for the BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPLETE bit */
wait_queue_head_t wait;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment