Commit 42107f50 authored by Alexey Dobriyan's avatar Alexey Dobriyan Committed by Patrick McHardy

netfilter: xtables: symmetric COMPAT_XT_ALIGN definition

Rewrite COMPAT_XT_ALIGN in terms of dummy structure hack.
Compat counters logically have nothing to do with it.
Use ALIGN() macro while I'm at it for same types.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
parent 0a026046
......@@ -93,8 +93,7 @@ struct _xt_align {
__u64 u64;
};
#define XT_ALIGN(s) (((s) + (__alignof__(struct _xt_align)-1)) \
& ~(__alignof__(struct _xt_align)-1))
#define XT_ALIGN(s) ALIGN((s), __alignof__(struct _xt_align))
/* Standard return verdict, or do jump. */
#define XT_STANDARD_TARGET ""
......@@ -571,8 +570,14 @@ struct compat_xt_counters_info {
struct compat_xt_counters counters[0];
};
#define COMPAT_XT_ALIGN(s) (((s) + (__alignof__(struct compat_xt_counters)-1)) \
& ~(__alignof__(struct compat_xt_counters)-1))
struct _compat_xt_align {
__u8 u8;
__u16 u16;
__u32 u32;
compat_u64 u64;
};
#define COMPAT_XT_ALIGN(s) ALIGN((s), __alignof__(struct _compat_xt_align))
extern void xt_compat_lock(u_int8_t af);
extern void xt_compat_unlock(u_int8_t af);
......
......@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ int xt_check_match(struct xt_mtchk_param *par,
* ebt_among is exempt from centralized matchsize checking
* because it uses a dynamic-size data set.
*/
pr_err("%s_tables: %s match: invalid size %Zu != %u\n",
pr_err("%s_tables: %s match: invalid size %u != %u\n",
xt_prefix[par->family], par->match->name,
XT_ALIGN(par->match->matchsize), size);
return -EINVAL;
......@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ int xt_check_target(struct xt_tgchk_param *par,
unsigned int size, u_int8_t proto, bool inv_proto)
{
if (XT_ALIGN(par->target->targetsize) != size) {
pr_err("%s_tables: %s target: invalid size %Zu != %u\n",
pr_err("%s_tables: %s target: invalid size %u != %u\n",
xt_prefix[par->family], par->target->name,
XT_ALIGN(par->target->targetsize), size);
return -EINVAL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment