Commit 42804358 authored by Matthew Wilcox's avatar Matthew Wilcox Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] Run timers as softirqs, not tasklets

The timer code is attempting to replicate the softirq characteristics at
the tasklet level, which is a little pointless.  This patch converts
timers to be a first-class softirq citizen.
parent 3a262a17
......@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ extern void free_irq(unsigned int, void *);
enum
{
HI_SOFTIRQ=0,
TIMER_SOFTIRQ,
NET_TX_SOFTIRQ,
NET_RX_SOFTIRQ,
SCSI_SOFTIRQ,
......
......@@ -66,9 +66,6 @@ typedef struct tvec_t_base_s tvec_base_t;
/* Fake initialization */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(tvec_base_t, tvec_bases) = { SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED };
/* Fake initialization needed to avoid compiler breakage */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_struct, timer_tasklet) = { NULL };
static void check_timer_failed(timer_t *timer)
{
static int whine_count;
......@@ -766,9 +763,9 @@ rwlock_t xtime_lock __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
unsigned long last_time_offset;
/*
* This function runs timers and the timer-tq in softirq context.
* This function runs timers and the timer-tq in bottom half context.
*/
static void run_timer_tasklet(unsigned long data)
static void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
{
tvec_base_t *base = &per_cpu(tvec_bases, smp_processor_id());
......@@ -781,7 +778,7 @@ static void run_timer_tasklet(unsigned long data)
*/
void run_local_timers(void)
{
tasklet_hi_schedule(&per_cpu(timer_tasklet, smp_processor_id()));
raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
}
/*
......@@ -1140,7 +1137,6 @@ static void __devinit init_timers_cpu(int cpu)
}
for (j = 0; j < TVR_SIZE; j++)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(base->tv1.vec + j);
tasklet_init(&per_cpu(timer_tasklet, cpu), run_timer_tasklet, 0UL);
}
static int __devinit timer_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
......@@ -1167,4 +1163,5 @@ void __init init_timers(void)
timer_cpu_notify(&timers_nb, (unsigned long)CPU_UP_PREPARE,
(void *)(long)smp_processor_id());
register_cpu_notifier(&timers_nb);
open_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ, run_timer_softirq, NULL);
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment