Commit 440e9067 authored by Guenter Roeck's avatar Guenter Roeck Committed by Ingo Molnar

perf/x86/intel/uncore: Drop unnecessary NULL checks after container_of()

The parameter passed to the pmu_enable() and pmu_disable() functions can not be
NULL because it is dereferenced by the caller.

That means the result of container_of() on that parameter can also never be NULL.
The existing NULL checks are therefore unnecessary and misleading. Remove them.

This change was made automatically with the following Coccinelle script.

  @@
  type t;
  identifier v;
  statement s;
  @@

  <+...
  (
    t v = container_of(...);
  |
    v = container_of(...);
  )
    ...
    when != v
  - if (\( !v \| v == NULL \) ) s
  ...+>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210510224849.2349861-1-linux@roeck-us.net
parent 88b06399
......@@ -801,8 +801,6 @@ static void uncore_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
struct intel_uncore_box *box;
uncore_pmu = container_of(pmu, struct intel_uncore_pmu, pmu);
if (!uncore_pmu)
return;
box = uncore_pmu_to_box(uncore_pmu, smp_processor_id());
if (!box)
......@@ -818,8 +816,6 @@ static void uncore_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
struct intel_uncore_box *box;
uncore_pmu = container_of(pmu, struct intel_uncore_pmu, pmu);
if (!uncore_pmu)
return;
box = uncore_pmu_to_box(uncore_pmu, smp_processor_id());
if (!box)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment