stackdepot: make fast paths lock-less again

With the introduction of the pool_rwlock (reader-writer lock), several
fast paths end up taking the pool_rwlock as readers.  Furthermore,
stack_depot_put() unconditionally takes the pool_rwlock as a writer.

Despite allowing readers to make forward-progress concurrently,
reader-writer locks have inherent cache contention issues, which does not
scale well on systems with large CPU counts.

Rework the synchronization story of stack depot to again avoid taking any
locks in the fast paths.  This is done by relying on RCU-protected list
traversal, and the NMI-safe subset of RCU to delay reuse of freed stack
records.  See code comments for more details.

Along with the performance issues, this also fixes incorrect nesting of
rwlock within a raw_spinlock, given that stack depot should still be
usable from anywhere:

 | [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
 | -----------------------------
 | swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
 | ffffffff89869be8 (pool_rwlock){..--}-{3:3}, at: stack_depot_save_flags
 | other info that might help us debug this:
 | context-{5:5}
 | 2 locks held by swapper/0/1:
 |  #0: ffffffff89632440 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __queue_work
 |  #1: ffff888100092018 (&pool->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __queue_work  <-- raw_spin_lock

Stack depot usage stats are similar to the previous version after a KASAN
kernel boot:

 $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/stackdepot/stats
 pools: 838
 allocations: 29865
 frees: 6604
 in_use: 23261
 freelist_size: 1879

The number of pools is the same as previously.  The freelist size is
minimally larger, but this may also be due to variance across system
boots.  This shows that even though we do not eagerly wait for the next
RCU grace period (such as with synchronize_rcu() or call_rcu()) after
freeing a stack record - requiring depot_pop_free() to "poll" if an entry
may be used - new allocations are very likely to happen in later RCU grace
periods.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240118110216.2539519-2-elver@google.com
Fixes: 108be8de ("lib/stackdepot: allow users to evict stack traces")
Reported-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>