Commit 444dd878 authored by Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar Rafael J. Wysocki

PM: runtime: Fix pm_runtime_active() kerneldoc comment

The kerneldoc comment of pm_runtime_active() does not reflect the
behavior of the function, so update it accordingly.

Fixes: 403d2d11 ("PM: runtime: Add kerneldoc comments to multiple helpers")
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
parent 0fcfb00b
...@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline bool pm_runtime_suspended(struct device *dev) ...@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline bool pm_runtime_suspended(struct device *dev)
* pm_runtime_active - Check whether or not a device is runtime-active. * pm_runtime_active - Check whether or not a device is runtime-active.
* @dev: Target device. * @dev: Target device.
* *
* Return %true if runtime PM is enabled for @dev and its runtime PM status is * Return %true if runtime PM is disabled for @dev or its runtime PM status is
* %RPM_ACTIVE, or %false otherwise. * %RPM_ACTIVE, or %false otherwise.
* *
* Note that the return value of this function can only be trusted if it is * Note that the return value of this function can only be trusted if it is
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment