sched/fair: Fix unnecessary increase of balance interval
In case of active balancing, we increase the balance interval to cover pinned tasks cases not covered by all_pinned logic. Neverthless, the active migration triggered by asym packing should be treated as the normal unbalanced case and reset the interval to default value, otherwise active migration for asym_packing can be easily delayed for hundreds of ms because of this pinned task detection mechanism. The same happens to other conditions tested in need_active_balance() like misfit task and when the capacity of src_cpu is reduced compared to dst_cpu (see comments in need_active_balance() for details). Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment