Commit 46e48e25 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

genirq: Move irq resource handling out of spinlocked region

Aside of being conceptually wrong, there is also an actual (hard to
trigger and mostly theoretical) problem.

CPU0				CPU1
free_irq(X)			interrupt X
				spin_lock(desc->lock)
				wake irq thread()
				spin_unlock(desc->lock)
spin_lock(desc->lock)
remove action()
shutdown_irq()			
release_resources()		thread_handler()
spin_unlock(desc->lock)		  access released resources.

synchronize_irq()

Move the release resources invocation after synchronize_irq() so it's
guaranteed that the threaded handler has finished.

Move the resource request call out of the desc->lock held region as well,
so the invocation context is the same for both request and release.

This solves the problems with those functions on RT as well.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170629214344.117028181@linutronix.de
parent 9114014c
...@@ -1168,6 +1168,14 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new) ...@@ -1168,6 +1168,14 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT; new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT;
mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex); mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex);
if (!desc->action) {
ret = irq_request_resources(desc);
if (ret) {
pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n",
new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name);
goto out_mutex;
}
}
chip_bus_lock(desc); chip_bus_lock(desc);
...@@ -1271,13 +1279,6 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new) ...@@ -1271,13 +1279,6 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
} }
if (!shared) { if (!shared) {
ret = irq_request_resources(desc);
if (ret) {
pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n",
new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name);
goto out_unlock;
}
init_waitqueue_head(&desc->wait_for_threads); init_waitqueue_head(&desc->wait_for_threads);
/* Setup the type (level, edge polarity) if configured: */ /* Setup the type (level, edge polarity) if configured: */
...@@ -1386,6 +1387,10 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new) ...@@ -1386,6 +1387,10 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc); chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
if (!desc->action)
irq_release_resources(desc);
out_mutex:
mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex); mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
out_thread: out_thread:
...@@ -1484,7 +1489,6 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id) ...@@ -1484,7 +1489,6 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
if (!desc->action) { if (!desc->action) {
irq_settings_clr_disable_unlazy(desc); irq_settings_clr_disable_unlazy(desc);
irq_shutdown(desc); irq_shutdown(desc);
irq_release_resources(desc);
irq_remove_timings(desc); irq_remove_timings(desc);
} }
...@@ -1527,6 +1531,9 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id) ...@@ -1527,6 +1531,9 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
} }
} }
if (!desc->action)
irq_release_resources(desc);
mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex); mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data); irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment