Commit 4753eb2a authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller Committed by David S. Miller

[SPARC64]: Fix incorrect TSB lock bit handling.

The TSB_LOCK_BIT define is actually a special
value shifted down by 32-bits for the assembler
code macros.

In C code, this isn't what we want.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 96c6e0d8
......@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static void copy_tsb(struct tsb *old_tsb, unsigned long old_size,
: "=r" (tag), "=r" (pte)
: "r" (&old_tsb[i]), "i" (ASI_NUCLEUS_QUAD_LDD));
if (!tag || (tag & TSB_TAG_LOCK))
if (!tag || (tag & (1UL << TSB_TAG_LOCK_BIT)))
continue;
/* We only put base page size PTEs into the TSB,
......
......@@ -47,13 +47,14 @@
* possible solution is to use RCU for the freeing of the TSB.
*/
#define TSB_TAG_LOCK (1 << (47 - 32))
#define TSB_TAG_LOCK_BIT 47
#define TSB_TAG_LOCK_HIGH (1 << (TSB_TAG_LOCK_BIT - 32))
#define TSB_MEMBAR membar #StoreStore
#define TSB_LOCK_TAG(TSB, REG1, REG2) \
99: lduwa [TSB] ASI_N, REG1; \
sethi %hi(TSB_TAG_LOCK), REG2;\
sethi %hi(TSB_TAG_LOCK_HIGH), REG2;\
andcc REG1, REG2, %g0; \
bne,pn %icc, 99b; \
nop; \
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment