Commit 47ebe12f authored by Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente's avatar Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

staging: wlan-ng: Remove repeated words in comments

Remove duplicate words in comments at prism2mib and prism2sta files.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIgor Matheus Andrade Torrente <igormtorrente@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200803022022.501-1-igormtorrente@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 5ad17138
...@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int prism2mgmt_mibset_mibget(struct wlandevice *wlandev, void *msgp) ...@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int prism2mgmt_mibset_mibget(struct wlandevice *wlandev, void *msgp)
/* /*
** Determine if this is a "mibget" or a "mibset". If this is a ** Determine if this is a "mibget" or a "mibset". If this is a
** "mibget", then make sure that the MIB may be read. Otherwise, ** "mibget", then make sure that the MIB may be read. Otherwise,
** this is a "mibset" so make make sure that the MIB may be written. ** this is a "mibset" so make sure that the MIB may be written.
*/ */
isget = (msg->msgcode == DIDMSG_DOT11REQ_MIBGET); isget = (msg->msgcode == DIDMSG_DOT11REQ_MIBGET);
......
...@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ u32 prism2sta_ifstate(struct wlandevice *wlandev, u32 ifstate) ...@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ u32 prism2sta_ifstate(struct wlandevice *wlandev, u32 ifstate)
case WLAN_MSD_FWLOAD: case WLAN_MSD_FWLOAD:
wlandev->msdstate = WLAN_MSD_RUNNING_PENDING; wlandev->msdstate = WLAN_MSD_RUNNING_PENDING;
/* Initialize the device+driver for full /* Initialize the device+driver for full
* operation. Note that this might me an FWLOAD to * operation. Note that this might me an FWLOAD
* to RUNNING transition so we must not do a chip * to RUNNING transition so we must not do a chip
* or board level reset. Note that on failure, * or board level reset. Note that on failure,
* the MSD state is set to HWPRESENT because we * the MSD state is set to HWPRESENT because we
...@@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ void prism2sta_processing_defer(struct work_struct *data) ...@@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ void prism2sta_processing_defer(struct work_struct *data)
* we get back in range. We should block transmits and * we get back in range. We should block transmits and
* receives in this state. Do we need an indication here? * receives in this state. Do we need an indication here?
* Probably not since a polling user-mode element would * Probably not since a polling user-mode element would
* get this status from from p2PortStatus(FD40). What about * get this status from p2PortStatus(FD40). What about
* p80211? * p80211?
* Response: * Response:
* Block Transmits, Ignore receives of data frames * Block Transmits, Ignore receives of data frames
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment